Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 17;9:395. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00395

Table 3.

Participants' exercise performance parameters and pre- vs. post-changes.

Variable Test 4 × 30 (n = 29) Effect size 8 × 15 (n = 24) Effect size P-value 4 × 30 vs. 8 × 15 baseline P-value 4 × 30 vs. 8 × 15 pre-post
Resting HR, beats·min−1 Pre 100.4 ± 14.7 −0.22 96.3 ± 19.8 0.13 0.5989 0.3334
Post 97.0 ± 15.9 98.8 ± 21.0
Δ% −3.39 + 2.67
p-value 0.3717 0.9905
Resting LA, mmol·L−1 Pre 1.3 ± 0.4 −0.25 1.3 ± 0.5 −0.09 0.7086 0.8399
Post 1.2 ± 0.4 1.3 ± 0.4
Δ% −7.32 −2.92
p-value 0.3638 0.5067
Speed at IAT, m·s−1 Pre 3.00 ± 0.33 0.34 3.06 ± 0.30 −0.12 0.5362 0.0132#
Post 3.11 ± 0.30 3.02 ± 0.30
Δ% + 3.6* −1.43
p-value 0.0116 0.3190
HR at IAT, beats·min−1 Pre 175.3 ± 9.8 0.11 175.0 ± 12.5 −0.19 0.9087 0.0232#
Post 176.3 ± 8.2 172.8 ± 10.0
Δ% + 0.57 −1.26*
p-value 0.3873 0.0346
Maximal speed, m·s−1 Pre 4.25 ± 0.55 0.28 4.37 ± 0.51 0.21 0.3935 0.9332
Post 4.39 ± 0.48 4.48 ± 0.52
Δ% + 3.37* + 2.47*
p-value 0.0048 0.0415
Maximal LA, mmol·L−1 Pre 12.7 ± 2.5 0.0 12.9 ± 2.9 −0.08 0.7918 0.8322
Post 12.7 ± 2.6 12.6 ± 3.3
Δ% ± 0.0 −2.3
p-value 0.9050 0.9447
Maximal RPE, Borg scale Pre 19.9 ± 0.2 0.22 19.9 ± 0.2 0.27 0.8939 0.8322
Post 20.0 ± 0.0 20.0 ± 0.0
Δ% + 0.15 + 0.15
p-value 0.3265 0.3299
Maximal HR, beats·min−1 Pre 196.4 ± 7.8 0.13 197.8 ± 8.9 −0.05 0.5595 0.1161
Post 197.4 ± 7.5 197.4 ± 5.4
Δ% + 0.51 −0.20
p-value 0.4019 0.1949
HR recovery, beats·min−1 Pre −59.0 ± 15.2 1.14 −55.7 ± 13.1 1.37 0.4017 0.5277
Post −73.6 ± 9.7 −72.8 ± 11.5
Δ% + 24.8* + 30.7*
p-value <0.0001 0.0002

Data presented as mean ± SD. Changes (Δ) are presented in percent. Group 4 × 30, high-intensity interval training with 4 runs of 30 s duration; Group 8 × 15, high-intensity interval training with 8 runs of 15 s duration; HR, heart rate; HR recovery, HRmax - HR3min; LA, blood lactate concentration; IAT, individual anaerobic threshold (baseline lactate + 1.5 mmol·L−1); resting HR, HR determined before start of the exercise test; RPE, rated perceived exertion.

*

Significantly different from pre-intervention by within-group two-tailed paired t-test.

#

Significantly different by between-group two-way ANOVA. Effect sizes were calculated from means and SD (Cohen's d). All significant p-values have been highlighted.