. 2018 Apr 23;18:536. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5428-3

Table 6.

Logit regressions based on household wealth index (Model 4)

	Poor^a Odds ratio	Middle class^a Odds ratio	Rich^a Odds ratio
ITN (Specification 3)	0.805 (− 1.41)	1.325 (1.28)	1.229 (0.71)
IRS (Specification 3)	0.249 ^d (−7.35)	0.363 ^b (−1.88)	1.112 (0.20)
Both ITN and IRS (Specification 3)	0.257 ^d (−6.43)	0.752 (−0.43)	1.193 (0.24)
Individual attributes (I)
Age	1.019^d (2.61)	1.038^c (2.56)	1.029^b (1.68)
Female	0.944 (−0.48)	1.095 (0.43)	0.779 (−0.90)
Child weight	1.575^d (3.16)	1.672^b (1.66)	1.597 (1.14)
Weight square	0.982^d (−3.43)	0.974^c (−2.21)	0.977 (−1.34)
Environmental factors (E)
Rural	1.807^d (3.28)	1.529^b (1.91)	2.071^c (2.03)
Hhsize	1.048^c (02.15)	1.232^d (4.13)	1.046 (0.55)
Mother’s education (Base = no education)
Primary	0.679^b (−1.91)	1.350 (0.75)	2.697 (1.55)
Secondary and above	0.605^c (−2.15)	1.11 (0.35)	1.850 (1.07)
Father’s education (Base = no education)
Primary	0.651^c (−2.37)	0.878 (−0.24)	1.356 (0.32)
Secondary and above	0.618^d (−2.81)	0.888 (−0.25)	0.647 (− 0.53)
Malaria preventive measure (MP)
IRS	0.372^d (−6.12)	0.311^c (−2.23)	1.056 (0.10)
ITN^bprim_edu	1.438 (1.42)	1.300 (0.58)	3.544 ^c (2.57)
ITN^bsec_edu	0.699 (−1.02)	0.711 (−0.63)	0.123 ^d (−3.23)
BCC strategies
TV	0.795^b (−1.66)	0.611^c (−2.09)	0.712 (−0.71)
Radio	0.989 (−0.08)	0.992 (−0.03)	1.109 (0.24)
Newspaper^bprim_edu	0.194 (0.37)	1.862 (0.391)	1.069 (0.11)
Newspaper_sec_edu	0.181^c (−2.28)	0.314 (−1.08)	0.552 (−0.75)
Constant	0.218^d (−4.02)	0.004^c (−2.87)	0.002^c (−2.31)
Pseudo R2	0.079	0.091	0.097
Prob > chi2	121.31^d	50.83^d	43.69^d
N	1335	463	664

Source: Author’s own computation from GDHS 2014 data

T-statistics are in parentheses

^aPoorest and poorer = poor, middle = middle class, richer and richest = rich

^b, ^c, ^d Significant at 10, 5 and 1%, respectively

Bolded variables are statistically significant