Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 19;49(2):296–302. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.02.012

Table 3.

Correlation between the halo of inhibition from each microorganism associated to MIC value and microbial activity of rutin (compound detected from HPLC analysis).

Extracts and fractions Bacterial isolates (ATCC) Zone of inhibition (mm) MIC (mg/mL) RutinMIC (mg/mL) DMSO Antimicrobial agent (μg/mL)
Crude extract E. faecalis 29212 16 4.29 0.56 0 2
P. apiarus CI 14 17.18 1.13 0 0.39
P. aeruginosa 340 12 68.75 0.56 0 4



Chloroform E. faecalis 29212 12 4.29 0.56 0 2
S. aureus 25923 14 8.58 0.56 0 0.06
P. apiarus CI 16 4.29 1.13 0 0.39
P. thiaminolyticus CI 14 4.29 1.13 0 0.39
P. aeruginosa 340 10 68.75 0.56 0 4



Ethyl acetate E. faecalis 29212 12 4.29 0.56 0 2
S. aureus 25923 17 4.29 0.56 0 0.06
P. apiarus CI 14 4.29 1.13 0 0.39
P. thiaminolyticus CI 14 4.29 1.13 0 0.39
P. aeruginosa 340 11 34.37 0.56 0 4



n-butanol S. aureus 25923 16 34.37 0.56 0 0.06
P. aeruginosa 340 12 17.18 0.56 0 4

CI, clinical isolate.