Table II.
Full sample | Black | Hispanic | White | χ2 | Heterosexual | Nonheterosexual | χ2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% yes (n) | % yes (n) | % yes (n) | % yes (n) | % yes (n) | % yes (n) | |||
Would return to site | 79 (84) | 83 (24) | 87 (27) | 71 (27) | 2.96 | 80 (67) | 74 (17) | 0.37 |
Recommend to friend | 88 (94) | 93 (27) | 87 (27) | 90 (34) | 0.60 | 88 (74) | 87 (20) | 0.02 |
Use information in future | 94 (101) | 97 (28) | 97 (30) | 95 (36) | 0.22 | 94 (79) | 96 (22) | 0.09 |
Liked program a lot | 56 (60) | 55 (16) | 55 (17) | 55 (21) | 0.00 | 58 (49) | 48 (11) | 0.81 |
Learned a lot | 75 (80) | 83 (24) | 68 (21) | 68 (26) | 2.20 | 79 (66) | 61 (14) | 3.00 |
Program kept attention a lot | 65 (69) | 55 (16) | 68 (21) | 66 (25) | 1.19 | 68 (57) | 52 (12) | 1.94 |
Plan to discuss program with | ||||||||
Dating partners | 65 (69) | 72 (21) | 68 (21) | 61 (23) | 1.08 | 67 (56) | 57 (13) | 0.81 |
Best friend | 83 (89) | 72 (21)a | 94 (29)b | 90 (34)b | 6.18* | 87 (73)a | 70 (16)b | 3.88* |
Other friends/peers | 55 (59) | 52 (15) | 55 (17) | 55 (21) | 0.09 | 51 (43) | 70 (16) | 2.47 |
Mom | 50 (53) | 48 (14) | 45 (14) | 50 (19) | 0.16 | 54 (45) | 35 (8) | 2.55 |
Dad | 12 (13) | 10 (3) | 7 (2) | 21 (8) | 3.47 | 12 (10) | 13 (3) | 0.02 |
Someone else | 34 (36) | 28 (8) | 36 (11) | 42 (16) | 1.51 | 36 (30) | 26 (6) | 0.75 |
Different superscripts within a subgroup indicate significant differences between groups. For comparisons by ethnicity, nine participants who did not identify as black, white or Hispanic were removed. Also, no significant differences were observed between sexually active and nonsexually active participants (all Ps > 0.20); thus, results are not reported here.
P < .05.