Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 19;8(4):e020213. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020213

Table 5.

SSI analysis by ‘ITT’ assuming (1) all and (2) none of the participants violating protocol or lost to follow-up would have developed SSI

Antibiotic Prophylaxis Control group P values Absolute risk reduction 95% CI Relative risk reduction (%) NNTB (95% CI)
Analysis by ITT: assuming all the participants violating protocol or lost to follow-up would have developed SSI
n=77 n=77
No of SSI n=1 n=8
Incidence rate of SSI 1.3% 10.4% P=0.034* 9.1% 1.8 to 16.4 87.5 11.0 (6.1 to 55.6)
Analysis by ITT: assuming none of the participants violating protocol or lost to follow-up would have developed SSI
n=77 n=77
No of SSI n=5 n=16
Incidence rate of SSI 6.5% 20.8% P=0.017* 14.3% 3.7 to 24.9 68.8 7.0 (4.0 to 27.0)

*P values are results of Fisher’s exact test.

ITT, intention-to-treat; NNTB, number needed to treat for benefit; NNTH, number needed to treat for harm; SSI, surgical site infection.