Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 24.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Geriatr Med. 2013 Nov;29(4):873–893. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2013.07.009

Table 1. Factors modifying the progression from MCI to any form of dementia reported in at least one published study.

Authors,Ref. Year Sample Size and Cohort Definition Variable Outcome Definition Hazard Ratio (95% CI) Comment
Genetics
 Elias-Sonnenschein et al,73 2011 Meta-analysis of 35 studies including >6000 subjects APOE ε4 Alzheimer-type dementia 2.29 (1.88–2.80) Progression to Alzheimer-type dementia in homozygotes: 3.94 (2.09–7.33)
 Rodriguez-Rodriguez et al,75 2012 288 Spanish older adults with MCI APOE ε4, CLU Alzheimer-type dementia APOE ε4: 4.56 (2.23–9.38) CLU: 0.25 (0.07–0.84) Carriers of at least 6 genetic risk factors increased the risk of more rapid progression (HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.01–3.56)
 Tyas et al,74 2007 470 subjects from the Nun study APOE ε4 Any dementia 1.12 (0.60–2.08) Age was the only predictor for the progression of MCI to dementia
MCI Subtype
 Ravaglia et al,78 2008 60 Italian older adults with MCI; 27 with at least memory-domain MCI MCI with at least memory impairment Any dementia or Alzheimer-type dementia Any: 4.78 (2.83–8.07) Alzheimer: 5.92 (3.30–10.91) No difference in progression to dementia between those with nonamnestic MCI and those without MCI
 Zhou et al,79 2012 397 older adults with MCI from the ADNI cohort ADAS13 and CDR-sob scores Alzheimer-type dementia 6.9 (4.3–11.0) High-risk groups included those with ADAS13 >15.67 and CDR-sob >1.5
 Koepsell and Monsell,80 2012 3020 American older adults with MCI Nonamnestic single domain, MMSE and CDR scores, and FAQ score Reversion to normal cognition Nonamnestic single domain: 1.75 (1.29–2.38) MMSE: 1.21 (1.12–1.30) CDR-sob: 0.66 (0.57–0.77) FAQ ≥1: 0.72 (0.56–0.94) After 1 year of follow-up, 16% reverted to normal cognition and 20% progressed to dementia. Categorical comparison groups were amnestic single-domain, FAQ score of 0, and APOE ε4 noncarriers
 Yaffe et al,13 2006 305 American older adults with MCI MCI subtype: reference group was amnestic MCI Any dementia Single, nonamnestic: 0.60 (0.35–1.05) Multidomain MCI: 0.71 (0.44–1.14) MCI subtype predicted dementia type: amnestic MCI more likely to develop Alzheimer-type dementia; single nonamnestic MCI predicted FTD
Comorbidity
 Solfrizzi et al,91 2011 121 Italian older adults Metabolic syndrome Any dementia 7.80 (1.29–47.20) Metabolic syndrome did not increase risk of incident MCI
 Li et al,92 2012 257 Chinese older adults with MCI MRI, CTA, and clinical characteristics Any dementia Diabetes: 2.39 (1.07–5.33) WMC: 0.06 (0.02–0.20) Carotid stenosis: 159.06 (4.57–5537.67) Similar risk of progression to Alzheimer-type dementia
 Clerici et al,93 2012 245 Italian older adults receiving care in a memory disorders clinic MRI and clinical characteristics Any or Alzheimer-type dementias Combination of ≥1 deep WML and HIS ≥4: 3.5 (1.6–7.4) Similar result for the association with Alzheimer-type dementia
 Xu et al,98 2010 302 Swedish older adults with MCI Diabetes or prediabetes Any or Alzheimer-type dementias 3.89 (1.69–8.32) Similar risk of Alzheimer-type as with any dementia. Markers of disease control not considered
 DeCarli et al,95 2004 52 American adults with MCI visiting a memory clinic Vascular risk factors Alzheimer-type dementia (by CDR-sob score) Not significantly different, no HR reported Poor memory and executive function increased the risk of progression to Alzheimer-type dementia
 Li et al,99 2011 837 Chinese older adults with MCI Vascular risk factors Alzheimer-type dementia Treatment reduced Alzheimer dementia Treatment of more risk factors reduced the risk more than treatment of fewer risk factors
 Ravaglia et al,94 2006 165 Italian older adults with MCI Vascular risk factors Any dementia Diastolic blood pressure: 0.52 (0.32–0.84) Atrial fibrillation: 4.94 (1.89–12.88) After adjusting for confounders, neither nor hypertension
 Bettermann et al,100 2012 American older adults with MCI Statin use All-cause and Alzheimer-type dementia No difference between users and nonusers Statin use reduced the risk of incident dementia in cognitively normal subjects
Neuropsychiatric Symptoms
 Richard et al,108 2012 320 older adults from Manhattan, NY, USA CES-D ≥4 Any dementia 1.8 (1.0–3.1) Nonsignificant increase in risk of Alzheimer-type dementia
 Richard et al,104 2012 397 older adults from ADNI GDS-15—3-item Apathy score Alzheimer-type dementia 1.85 (1.09–3.15) Effect only significant in those without depression. A GDS score of ≥6 was an exclusion for the ADNI study
 Modrego and Ferrandez,105 2004 45 Italian older adults with MCI Depression (GDS and structured interview) Alzheimer-type dementia 2.6 (1.8–3.6)
 Palmer et al,106 2007 47 Swedish older adults with MCI Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale Alzheimer-type dementia 1.8 (1.2–2.7) Depressed mood increased risk of progression to Alzheimer in cognitively normal subjects
 Reynolds et al,107 2011 57 American older adults with MCI and depression Antidepressants with or without donepezil Any dementia NR; Reduced rate of progression to dementia (10% vs 33%) Higher risk of recurrent depression (likelihood ratio: 4.91; P = .03)

Abbreviations: ADAS13, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale with 13 items; ADNI, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging project; APOE, apolipoprotein; CDR-sob, Clinical Dementia Rating scale sum of boxes; CES-D, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression; CI, confidence interval; CLU, clusterin; CTA, computed tomographic angiography; FAQ, Functional Activities Questionnaire; FTD, frontotemporal dementia; GDS, Global Deterioration Scale; HIS, Hachinski Ischemic Score; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; MMSE, Mini-Mental Status Examination; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MTL, medial temporal lobe; NR, not reported; WML, white matter lesions.