Table 3.

Association Between Data-Driven Childhood Cumulative Social Risk Domains and Physical Capability and Common Affective Symptoms.

	Physical capability score		Common affective symptoms
	β (95% CI) (n = 1,991)		B (95% CI) (n = 2,190)
	Model 1a	Model 2b	Model 1a	Model 2b
Socioeconomic and material disadvantagec
0	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
1	−0.07 [−0.13, 0.01]	−0.04 [−0.11, −0.03]	0.34 [−0.69, 1.37]	0.42 [−0.68, 1.53]
2	−0.10 [−0.16, 0.04]	−0.04 [−0.12, 0.04]	0.12 [−0.97, 1.21]	0.24 [−1.11, 1.59]
≥3	−0.16 [−0.23,−0.10]	−0.91 [−0.18, −0.00]	0.29 [−0.88, 1.46]	0.36 [−1.12, 1.84]
p for trend	<.001	.038	.775	.891
Overcrowding, physical neglect and low parental concern for child’s educationd
0	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
1	−0.09 [−0.13, −0.04]	−0.05 [−0.11, 0.01]	0.24 [−1.05, 0.57]	−0.34 [−1.37, 0.68]
2	−0.13 [−0.19, −0.07]	−0.10 [−0.17, 0.02]	0.33 [−0.82, 1.50]	−0.15 [−1.21, 1.52]
≥3	−0.22 [−0.32, −0.11]	−0.16 [−0.28, −0.04]	0.97 [−0.93, 2.86]	0.57 [−1.56, 2.70]
p for trend	.01	.02	.409	.563
Maladaptive family functioninge
0	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
1	0.01 [−0.04, 0.06]	0.01 [−0.04, 0.06]	0.94 [0.02, 1.87]	0.92 [−0.01, 1.85]
≥2	−0.05 [−0.10, 0.01]	−0.04 [−0.10, 0.01]	2.19 [1.15, 3.23]	2.15 [1.10, 3.20]
p for trend	.17	.22	<.001	<.001

Note. CI = confidence interval.

^aModel 1 adjusted for sex.

^bModel 2 adjusted for sex and all other childhood cumulative social risk domains.

^cSocioeconomic and material disadvantage risk domain included low maternal education, low father’s social class, private landlord owned house, poor amenities, and poorly repaired house.

^dOvercrowding, physical neglect, and low parental concern for child’s education risk domain included low maternal education, overcrowding, unclean child, poorly cleaned house, poor state of child’s clothes, and low parental concern for child’s education.

^eMaladaptive family functioning included maltreatment, mother’s affectionless control, and father’s affectionless control.