Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Sep 29;100(2):391–407. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.09.041

Table 3.

Dose-response models for secondary cancers in the head and neck region based on cohort studies of long-term cancer survivors. Relevance scores presented as total and (patient material, study design, radiation therapy, modeling approach).

Secondary cancer
Endpoint definition Patient material Time point Significant non-dosimetric risk factors Model and parameters (95% CIs) Reference
Treatment-related esophageal cancer in a cohort of breast cancer survivors Nested case-control study of 289,748 breast cancer survivors with 252 cases and 488 matched controls Between 5 and 37 years post breast cancer treatment Smoking: (Current vs. Nonsmoker)
Hormonal therapy in last 5 years: (Yes vs. No)
Linear model:
EOR/Gy Esophagus mean dose = 0.09 (0.04, 0.16)
ORSmoking = 2.4 (1.1, 5.7)
ORHormonal therapy = 0.4 (0.2, 0.8)
Performance measures N/A
Morton et al. 201265
Relevance score: 110 (40, 20, 5, 45)

Radiation-induced secondary cancer of the mouth and pharynx Cohort study based on atomic bomb survivors receiving high doses and Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients treated with RT Time factors included in model Age at exposure: (Continuous)
Attained age: (Continuous)
EAR plateau OED model:
αMouth and pharynx = 0.045
βEAR = 0.73 (0.30, 1.60)
γage at exposure = −0.024
γattained age = 2.38
Performance measures N/A
Schneider et al. 201167
Relevance score: 85 (40, 10, 5, 30)