Table 3.
Statistical results for enculturation effects on metric deviant MMNm.
| df | df error | F | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFFECT ON MMNm AMPLITUDE | |||||
| Enculturation | 1 | 23 | 0.34 | 0.568 | 0.01 |
| Pattern (odd, even) | 1 | 23 | 0.08 | 0.774 | 0.00 |
| Enculturation × Pattern | 1 | 23 | 4.70 | 0.041* | 0.17 |
| Hemisphere | 1 | 23 | 0.36 | 0.967 | 0.00 |
| Control (early, late) | 1 | 23 | 0.26 | 0.615 | 0.01 |
| Enculturation × Control | 1 | 23 | 0.04 | 0.842 | 0.00 |
| EFFECT ON MMNm LATENCY | |||||
| Enculturation | 1 | 23 | 8.07 | 0.009* | 0.26 |
| Pattern (odd, even) | 1 | 23 | 3.89 | 0.061† | 0.15 |
| Enculturation × Pattern | 1 | 23 | 0.18 | 0.676 | 0.01 |
| Hemisphere | 1 | 23 | 0.20 | 0.656 | 0.01 |
| Control (early, late) | 1 | 23 | 0.95 | 0.340 | 0.04 |
| Enculturation × Control | 1 | 23 | 0.65 | 0.429 | 0.03 |
Effects of enculturation on MMNm amplitude and latency measured in the combined gradiometer sensors and estimated with two mixed-effect ANOVA models. df designates the degrees of freedom. Significant effects are marked by *. Trends approaching significance are marked by †. Estimated effect sizes are provided in partial eta squared values, .