Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 21;20(5):411–424. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2018.02.005

Table 2.

Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Clinicopathological and POH1 Expression for Overall Survival in CRC Patients (n=315)

Variables Univariate Analysis
Multivariate Analysis
HR (95% CI) P Value HR (95% CI) P Value
Age (<59 vs. ≥59 years) 1.047 (0.732-1.497) .803
Gender (female vs. male) 0.954 (0.661-1.376) .800
BMI (<24 vs. ≥24) 1.546 (1.072-2.231) .020 1.593 (1.092-2.325) .016
Hypertension (yes vs. no) 1.373 (0.923-2.042) .118
Diabetes (yes vs. no) 2.084 (1.311-3.312) .002 2.025 (1.253-3.274) .004
T stage(I-II vs. III-IV) 2.995 (1.647-5.445) .000 1.941 (0.898-4.195) .092
Metastasis (yes vs. no) 4.015 (2.725-5.917) .000 0.477 (0.241-0.945) .034
TNM (I-II vs. III-IV) 5.212 (3.438 -7.900) .000 5.931 (2.692-13.07) .000
LNM (yes vs. no) 2.182 (1.497-3.181) .000 2.182 (1.361-3.497) .001
Tumor differentiation 1.496 (0.963-2.325) .073
R0 resection (yes vs. no) 0.466 (0.301-0.719) .001 0.509 (0.321-0.807) .004
CEA (<5 vs. ≥5 μg/l) 2.345 (1.590-3.458) .000 1.277 (0.828-1.968) .268
CA19-9 (<37 vs. ≥37 U/ml) 3.149 (2.182-4.545) .000 1.251 (1.761-3.981) .000
POH1 expression (low vs. high) 1.983 (1.135-3.465) .016 1.848 (1.031-3.310) .039

BMI, body mass index; LNM, lymph node metastasis; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.