Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 8;43(6):1212–1223. doi: 10.1038/npp.2017.244

Table 1. Electrophysiological Properties of PL and IL Neurons.

Groups Vm(mV) Rin(MΩ) Rheobase (pA) Threshold (mV) sAHP (mV) mAHP (mV)
PL
 Saline–Vehicle −66.8±1.6 106.0±13.3 117.7±12.3* 31.2±1.4 −0.5±0.1 −0.8±0.2
 Saline–4 mg/kg −71.8±1.3 90.1±6.7 90.1±7.8 30.9±1.2 −0.8±0.3 −1.6±0.5
 Cocaine–Vehicle −69.9±1.3 87.2±7.7 101.8±10.1 29.8±1.1 −0.6±0.2 −1.1±0.2
 Cocaine–4 mg −65.7±1.3 81.8±5.0 110.8±10.0 31.5±1.3 −0.8±0.2 −1.1±0.2
             
IL
 Saline–Vehicle −65.8±1.3 93.9±5.6 81.9±5.2* 31.9±0.8 −1.8±0.3 −2.2±0.3
 Saline–4 mg/kg −68.1±1.8 115.0±10.0 72.0±9.5 30.4 ±1.3 −1.0±0.4 −1.6±0.4
 Cocaine–Vehicle −66.6±1.0 108.9±13.3 94.8±9.8 30.7±0.9 −1.46±0.3 −2.2±0.4
 Cocaine–4 mg −68.5±1.5 90.8±6.8 78.0±6.7* 28.5±1.0 −1.4± 0.2 −2.3±0.3

Two-way ANOVA showed no difference between the groups for any measure per brain subregion (p>0.05). Two-way ANOVA showed a treatment main effect in the amount of depolarizing current necessary to evoke an action potential (rheobase) between subregions (F(3, 190)=5.128, p<0.05). Tukey's post hoc multiple comparisons test showed that PL–Saline–Vehicle neuron rheobase is significantly different compared with IL neuron rheobase from Saline–Vehicle and Cocaine–4 mg/kg groups (*p<0.05).