Table 3.

Adjusted Associations between Race/Ethnicity and Productivity, Advancement, Retention, Satisfaction, and Compensation in 2012–13 in the National Faculty Survey, From a Multi-Institutional Study of Race/Ethnicity and Success in Academic Medicine^a

Characteristic	Publicationsb (n = 872)		Grant/past 2 yearsc (n = 1,169)		Rank of professord (n = 835)		Senior leadershipe (n = 1,201)		Retention in academiaf (n = 1,138)		Satisfactiong (n = 547)		Compensationh (n = 466)
	Ratio	CI	OR	CI	OR	CI	OR	CI	OR	CI	Difference	CI	Difference	CI
White (reference)
Non-URM	0.93	0.71, 1.2	1.01	0.59, 1.7	0.98	0.46, 2.1	0.59	0.28, 1.28	0.69	0.37, 1.3	−0.16	−1.59, 1.26	$1,120	−$36,700, 38,900
URM	0.64	0.51, 0.79	0.74	0.48, 1.2	0.53	0.3, 0.93	0.78	0.46, 1.32	0.49	0.32, 0.75	−0.41	−1.55, 0.73	−$2,440	−$32,000, $27,100

Abbreviation: CI indicates confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; URM underrepresented in medicine.

^aRatio: relative number compared to Whites; OR: odds ratio compared to Whites; difference: mean difference compared to Whites; CI: 95% confidence interval. All models included gender as a covariate.

^bModel for publications adjusted for medical specialization and years in academia.

^cModel for grants adjusted for setting and medical specialization.

^dModel for rank adjusted for setting, total number of refereed articles in 1995, and years in academia.

^eModel for senior leadership adjusted for total number of refereed articles in 1995.

^rModel for retention adjusted for medical specialization and total number of refereed articles in 1995.

^gModel for satisfaction adjusted for rank and effort distribution in teaching, clinical and research activities.

^hModel for compensation adjusted for setting, rank, and effort distribution in teaching, clinical and research activities.