Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jan 29;111:26–35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.01.014

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A and C: Observed (datapoints) versus predicted (x’s) conditional accuracy functions (CAFs) and delta plots for each group and condition of Dataset 1 (panel A; van Wouwe et al., 2014) and Dataset 2 (panel B, van Wouwe et al., 2016) averaged across subjects. Each datapoint is accompanied by a 95% confidence interval assuming a student’s t distribution. B and D: Observed (x-axis) versus predicted (y-axis) RT quantiles of correct responses across individual subjects and conditions from Dataset 1 (Panel B) and Dataset 2 (Panel D). comp: compatible stimulus-response; incomp: incompatible stimulus-response.