Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2017 Jan 4;39(9):866–875. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1273321

Table 1.

Demographics and Cognitive Screening, Episodic Memory, and Paced Finger-Tapping Performances by Group

ε4− (n = 65) ε4+ (n = 41) MCI^ (n = 24) F p ηp2 (p’s < .05)

Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
  Demographics
Age (years) 73.3 5.1 72.2 4.9 75.5 6.6 3.01 .053 .045
Education (years) 14.5 2.4 15.6 2.8 14.4 2.7 2.56 .081 .039
Sex (male/female) 19/46 14/27 6/18 0.64a .726 .070b

  Cognitive Screening
MMSE ( /30) 29.3 0.8 29.1 1.1 27.3 2.1 22.66c <.001 .263 MCI < ε4−, ε4+
DRS-2
 Attention ( /37) 36.5 0.7 36.4 0.8 35.6 1.5 7.84 .001 .110 MCI < ε4−
 Initiation/Perseveration ( /37) 36.8 0.5 36.5 1.8 34.3 2.7 20.44c <.001 .243 MCI < ε4−, ε4+
 Construction ( /6) 5.9 0.2 6.0 0.2 5.8 0.4 3.97 .021 .059 ns
 Conceptualization ( /39) 37.2 2.5 37.3 1.8 36.1 2.3 1.36d .261 .021
 Memory ( /25) 24.1 1.1 24.1 1.4 19.4 4.1 50.82 <.001 .445 MCI < ε4−, ε4+
 Total ( /144) 140.5 2.9 140.0 3.7 131.2 7.0 42.70d <.001 .402 MCI < ε4−, ε4+

  Episodic Memory
RAVLT
 Trials 1–5 ( /75) 48.6 8.8 46.2 8.8 29.8 7.7 38.24c <.001 .376 MCI < ε4−, ε4+
 Immediate Recall ( /15) 9.8 2.6 8.4 2.5 4.1 2.5 39.65c <.001 .384 MCI < ε4−, ε4+; ε4+ < ε4−
 Delayed Recall ( /15) 9.8 2.7 8.7 3.0 3.0 1.9 52.06c <.001 .451 MCI < ε4−, ε4+; ε4+ < ε4−

  Paced Finger-Tapping (ms)
M-ITI (meanx − target) −21 66 −35 52 −71 88 0.93e .399 .014
SD-ITI 55 31 53 30 82 48 3.66ce .029 .054 MCI > ε4−, ε4+*

Note. ε4 = apolipoprotein E-epsilon 4; MCI = mild cognitive impairment; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; DRS-2 = Dementia Rating Scale-2nd Edition; RAVLT = Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test; ms = milliseconds; ITI = inter-tap interval.

^

9 ε4−, 15 ε4+.

a

Pearson Chi-Square Test.

b

Cramer’s V.

c

ANOVA results using standardized residual scores based on regression with age as a predictor.

d

ANOVA results using standardized residual scores based on regression with age and education as predictors.

e

Reciprocal square root data transformation.

*

p < .10.