Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec;3(4):26–31. doi: 10.29252/cmm.3.4.26

Table 3.

Results of onychomycosis agents identification in 133 culture-positive cases

Causative agent Identification method Frequency %
Dermatophytes T. interdigitale ITS-RFLP 28 21.1
E. floccosum ITS-RFLP 14 10.5
M. canis ITS-RFLP 2 1.5
T. rubrum ITS-RFLP 7 5.25
Total 51 38.35
Yeasts C. albicans ITS-RFLP 39 29.35
C. tropicalis ITS-RFLP 6 4.5
C. glabrata ITS-RFLP 3 2.25
C. parapsilosis ITS-RFLP 17 12.8
C. krusei ITS-RFLP 4 3.0
C. guilliermondii ITS-RFLP 1 0.75
Aureobasidium pullulans ITS-sequencing 1 0.75
Trichosporon asahii ITS-sequencing 1 0.75
Mixed yeast infection ITS-RFLP 4 3.0
Total 76 57.15
Non-dermatophytic molds Chaetomium subglobosum ITS-sequencing 1 0.75
Aphanoascus verrucosus ITS-sequencing 1 0.75
Penicillum ruber BT2-sequencing 1 0.75
Aspergillus terreus BT2-sequencing 1 0.75
Aspergillus niger BT2-sequencing 1 0.75
Aspergillus flavus BT2-sequencing 1 0.75
Total - 6 4.5
Total - 133 100.0