Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 25;3(2):e00023-18. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00023-18

FIG 7 .

FIG 7 

Morphological analysis of WT and Krp1 mutants. (A) FEG-SEM analysis of representative cells belonging to the different genotypes. The right panels represent magnified views of the capsular structures outlined by red broken lines in the left panels. (B) Fiber thickness measured from 20 to 30 cells of WT, krp1Δ, and krp1Δ::KRP1 strains. One-way ANOVA followed by posthoc Dunnett test was performed. Values that are significantly different from the value for the wild type (R265) are indicated by asterisks as follows: ****, P < 0.0001; **, P < 0.01.