Abstract
The age‐specific mortality rate of ovarian cancer is increasing among women over 50 years of age, but remaining at a stable level among women under 50. This case‐control study of ovarian cancer was undertaken to assess the environmental factors which may increase the mortality of the disease in the elderly. Fifty‐six women with primary epithelial ovarian cancer whose ages were 50 years old or over were compared with two age‐matched control groups. The results of the Mantel‐Haenszel analysis were as follows. More cases were found to have never married than controls (P<0.05), a larger proportion of cases were nulliparous (P<0.05), a smaller proportion of cases had experienced an induced abortion (P< 0.05) or had undergone permanent sterilization by tubal ligation (P<0.05), the occurrence of breast or uterine cancer was more common in the mother or sisters of cases (P<0.01), a larger percentage of cases used to eat meat daily (P< 0.01) or used to eat fish daily (P< 0.05), and a larger proportion of cases weighed under 40 kg (P<0.05). Daily meat consumption was significantly associated with the occurrence of ovarian cancer even after adjusting for reproductive and other risk factors by conditional logistic regression analysis. The attributable risk for ovarian cancer in the elderly was 19.2% for daily meat consumption. The recent change in dietary habits might in part explain the rise of the mortality rate among the Japanese elderly.
Keywords: Ovarian neoplasms, Retrospective study, Risk factor, Diet
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (335.9 KB).
References
- 1).Mori , M. , Harabuchi , I. , Miyake , H. , Casagrande , J. T. , Henderson , B. E. and Ross , R. K.Reproductive, genetic, and dietary risk factors for ovarian cancer . Am. J. Epidemiol. , in press . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2).Kleinbaum , D. G. , Kupper , L. L. and Morgenstern , H. “ Epidemiologic Research. Principles and Quantitative Methods ,” pp . 377 – 402 ( 1982. ). Life Learning Publications; , Belmont . [Google Scholar]
- 3).Breslow , N. E. and Day , N. E. “ Statistical Methods in Cancer Research. Volume 1 The Analysis of Case‐control Studies ,” IARC Scientific Publications No. 32 , pp . 248 – 279 ( 1980. ). International Agency for Research on Cancer; , Lyon . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4).Fleiss , J. L. “ Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions ,” 2nd Ed. , pp . 93 – 95 ( 1981. ). John Wiley and Sons, Inc. , New York . [Google Scholar]
- 5).Johnson , R. A. and Wichern , D. W. “ Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis ,” pp . 291 – 358 ( 1982. ). Prentice‐Hall, Inc. , Englewood Cliffs . [Google Scholar]
- 6).La Vecchia , C. , Decarli , A. , Negri , E. , Parazzini , F. , Gentile , A. , Cecchitti , G. , Fasoli , M. and Franceschi , S.Dietary factors and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer . J. Natl. Cancer Inst. , 79 , 663 – 669 ( 1987. ). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7).Cramer , D. W. , Welch , W. R. , Hutchison , G. B. , Willett , W. and Scully , R. E.Dietary animal fat in relation to ovarian cancer . Obstet. Gynecol. , 63 , 833 – 838 ( 1984. ). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8).Byers , T. , Marshall , J. , Graham , S. , Mettlin , C. and Swanson , M.A case‐control study of dietary and nondietary factors in ovarian cancer . J. Natl. Cancer Inst. , 71 , 681 – 686 ( 1983. ). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9).Hirayama , T.An analytical epidemiology of ovarian cancer and possible environmental carcinogenesis . Med. Chugai , 34 , 282 – 286 ( 1981. ) ( in Japanese ). [Google Scholar]
- 10).Snowdson , D. A.Diet and ovarian cancer . J. Am. Med. Assoc. , 254 , 356 – 357 ( 1985. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11).Armstrong , B. K. , Brown , J. B. , Clarke , H. T. , Crooke , D. K. , Hähnel , R. , Masarei , J. R. and Ratajczak , T.Diet and reproductive hormones. A study of vegetarian and nonvegetarian postmenopausal women . J. Natl. Cancer Inst. , 67 , 761 – 767 ( 1981. ). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12).Hill , P. , Garbaczewski , L. , Helman , P. , Huskisson , J. , Sporangisa , E. and Wynder , E. L.Diet, lifestyle, and menstrual activity . Am. J. Clin. Nutr. , 33 , 1192 – 1198 ( 1980. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13).Cramer , D. W. and Welch , W. R.Determinants of ovarian cancer risk. II. Inferences regarding pathogenesis . J. Natl. Cancer Inst. , 71 , 717 – 721 ( 1983. ). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14).McGowan , L. , Parent , L. , Ledner , W. and Norris , H. J.The women at risk for developing ovarian cancer . Gynecol. Oncol. , 7 , 325 – 344 ( 1979. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15).Lynch , H. T. , Guirgis , H. A. , Albert , S. , Brennan , M. , Lynch , J. , Kraft , C. , Pocekay , D. , Vaughns , C. and Kaplan , A.Familial association of carcinoma of the breast and ovary . Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. , 138 , 717 – 724 ( 1974. ). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16).Lynch , H. T. , Harris , R. E. , Guirgis , H. A. , Maloney , K. , Carmody , L. L. and Lynch , J. F.Familial association of breast/ovarian carcinoma . Cancer , 41 , 1543 – 1549 ( 1978. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]