Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 12;14(4):e1006067. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006067

Table 1. Summary of the parameters used in the model and values for rust pathogens.

Notation Parameter Value(s) for rust pathogens used in the simulations a
Simulation parameters
Y Number of simulated years 50 years
T Number of time steps in a cropping season 120 days.year-1
J Number of fields in the landscape {155; 154; 152; 153; 156} b
V Number of host cultivars 2
Initial conditions and seasonality
Cv0 Plantation host density of cultivar v 0.1 m-2 c
Cvmax Maximal host density of cultivar v 2 m-2 c
δv Host growth rate of cultivar v 0.1 day-1 c
ϕ Initial probability of infection 5.10−4
λ Off-season survival probability 10−4
Pathogen aggressiveness components
emax Maximal expected infection rate 0.40 spore-1
γmin Minimal expected latent period duration 10 days
γvar Variance of the latent period duration 9 days
Υmax Maximal expected infectious period duration 24 days
Υvar Variance of the infectious period duration 105 days
rmax Maximal expected propagule production rate 3.125 spores.day-1
Pathogen dispersal
g(.) Dispersal kernel Power-law function d
a Scale parameter 40
b Width of the tail 7
π(.) Contamination function Sigmoid curve
κ Related to position of the inflexion point 5.33 e
σ Related to position of the inflexion point 3 e
Host-pathogen genetic interaction
G Total number of major genes {1; 2}
τg Mutation probability for infectivity gene g f 10−4 g
τw Mutation probability for aggressiveness component w f 10−4 g
Qw Number of pathotypes relative to aggressiveness component w 6 g
ρg Efficiency of major gene g 1.0 g
ρw Efficiency of quantitative trait w 0.5 g
θg Cost of infectivity of infective gene g 0.5 g
θw Cost of aggressiveness for component w 0.5 g
βw Trade-off strength for aggressiveness component w 1.0 g

a model parameterisation is detailed in S1 Text.

b values for the five landscape structures.

c same value for all cultivars (no cost of resistance).

d g(zz)=(b2)(b1)2.π.a2.(1+zza)b with ‖z′ − z‖ the Euclidian distance between locations z and z’ in fields i and i’, respectively; the mean dispersal distance is given by: 2a(b3)=20m.

e the position of the inflexion point of the sigmoid curve is given by the relation x0=((σ1)/κσ)1σ0.5

f probability for a propagule to change its infectivity or its aggressiveness on a resistant cultivar carrying major gene g or quantitative resistance trait w.

g same value for all major genes, quantitative resistance traits, infectivity genes and aggressiveness components.