Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 25;13(4):e0194526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194526

Table 7. Performance measures comparisons with state-of-the-art CBIR techniques on the Caltech-256 image collection (bold values indicate best performance).

Performance measures Proposed technique based on visual words fusion Q-Way [45] Dense SIFT [46]
MAP 38.98 38.56 38.57
Avg. Recall 7.796 7.712 7.714