Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2018 Feb 16;7(3):133–141. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2018.02.003

Table 3.

Driver oncogene mutations stratified by PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) and by specimen type

Oncogene mutation (overall cohort) Total (n=223) <1% PD-L1 TPS (n=87) 1–49% PD-L1 TPS (n=55) ≥50% PD-L1 TPS (n=81)
EGFR 30 (13.5%) 14 (16.1%) 10 (18.2%) 6 (7.4%)
ALK 7 (3.1%) 2 (2.3%) 0 (0%) 5 (6.2%)
ROS1 2 (0.9%) 1 (1.1%) 1 (1.8%) 0 (0%)
KRAS 60 (27.0%) 19 (21.8%) 13 (23.6%) 28 (34.6%)
Oncogene mutation (cytology cell block) Total (n=88) <1% PD-L1 TPS (n=35) 149% PD-L1 TPS (n=20) ≥50% PD-L1 TPS (n=33)
EGFR 12 (13.6%) 6 (17.1%) 5 (25.0%) 1 (3.0%)
ALK 4 (4.5%) 1 (2.9%) 0 (0%) 3 (9.1%)
ROS1 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
KRAS 24 (27.3%) 9 (25.7%) 4 (20.0%) 11 (33.3%)
Oncogene mutation (surgical pathology) Total (n=135) <1% PD-L1 TPS (n=52) 149% PD-L1 TPS (n=35) ≥50% PD-L1 TPS (n=48)
EGFR 18 (13.3%) 8 (15.4%) 5 (14.3%) 5 (10.4%)
ALK 3 (2.2%) 1 (1.9%) 0 (0%) 2 (4.2%)
ROS1 2 (1.5%) 1 (1.9%) 1 (2.9%) 0 (0%)
KRAS 36 (26.7%) 10 (19.2%) 9 (25.7%) 17 (35.4%)

Statistical comparisons for cytology cell block vs. surgical pathology specimens: total, p = 0.62; <1% PD-L1 TPS, p = 1.0; 1–49% PD-L1 TPS, p=0.64; ≥50% PD-L1 TPS, p=0.39; Fisher exact test.