Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 26;13(4):e0192744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192744

Table 2. The correlations between the clinicopathological factors and the area of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes.

The density of TILs
High (N = 42) Low (N = 118) p-value
Sex
Male 19 (11.9%) 65 (40.6%) 0.2726
Female 23 (14.4%) 53 (33.1%)
Age (years)
Median(range) 68 (34–89) 65 (26–90) 0.1594
Tumor location
Colon 22 (13.8%) 64 (40.0%) 0.8359
Rectum 20 (12.5%) 54 (33.8%)
Tumor size (cm)
Median(range) 5.1 (1.0–10.0) 4.5 (1.0–11.0) 0.1874
Depth of tumor invasion
T1,2,3 33 (20.6%) 73 (45.6%) 0.0435
T4 9 (5.6%) 45 (28.1%)
Lymph node metastasis
Negative 27 (16.9%) 63 (39.4%) 0.2187
Positive 15 (9.4%) 55 (34.4%)
Lymphatic vessel invasion
Negative 15 (9.4%) 23 (14.4%) 0.0391
Positive 27 (16.9%) 95 (59.4%)
Venous invasion
Negative 38 (23.9%) 90 (56.6%) 0.0135
Positive 3 (1.9%) 28 (17.6%)
Preoperative CEA level
≤5 ng/ml 30 (18.8%) 73 (45.6%) 0.2609
>5 ng/ml 12 (7.5%) 45 (28.1%)
Preoperative CA19-9 level
≤ 37 U/ml 39 (24.8%) 99 (63.1%) 0.2273
>37 U/ml 3 (1.9%) 16 (10.2%)
Histology
Moderately or Well 40 (25.0%) 107 (66.9%) 0.3282
Other 2 (1.3%) 11 (6.9%)
Adjuvant chemotherapy
Negative 15 (6.3%) 41 (25.8%) 0.8321
Positive 26 (16.4%) 77 (48.4%)
Mismatch repair status
Proficient 40 (25.6%) 107 (68.6%) 0.7385
Deficient 2 (1.3%) 7 (4.5%)

TILs, tumor infiltrating lymphocyte; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19–9.