Table 2.
Post-intervention ratings of different aspects of ReMind (n = 13)
| Difficulty of | (Too) easy | Just right | (Too) difficult |
| Information in strategy training | 3 | 10 | – |
| Fill-in exercises in strategy training | 1 | 10 | 2 |
| Retraining (C-Car game) | 4 | 9 | – |
| Amount/number of | (Too) little/few | About right | (Too) much/many |
| Information in strategy training | 1 | 12 | – |
| Fill-in exercises in strategy training | – | 9 | 4 |
| Retraining exercises (C-Car game) | 4 | 8 | 1 |
| Supervision of the researcher/trainer | – | 13 | – |
| Usefulness of | (Very) useful | Neutral | Not useful |
| Information in strategy training | 7 | 6 | – |
| Fill-in exercises in strategy training | 3 | 9 | 1 |
| Retraining exercises (C-Car game) | 11 | 2 | – |
| (Telephone) contact with the researcher/trainer | 13 | – | – |
| Content addressed daily problems | Fully/largely | Partly | Not |
| 8 | 4 | 1 | |
| Application of learnt (strategies) in daily life | Often/regularly | Sometimes | Seldom/never |
| 3 | 5 | 5 | |
| Impact of cognitive problems has changed | Yes, positively | Noa | Yes, negatively |
| 6 | 7 | – | |
| Coping with cognitive problems has changed | Improved coping | Nob | Worsened coping |
| 5 | 8 | – | |
| Pleasantness of working on ReMind | (Very) pleasant | Neutral | (Very) unpleasant |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | |
| Excellent/good | Sufficient | Insufficient/poor | |
| Using an iPad-app for cognitive rehabilitation | 11 | 1 | 1 |
| Capability of the researcher/trainer | 13 | – | – |
| Contact with the researcher/trainer | 12 | 1 | – |
| Overall rating of the program | 11 | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | No | ||
| Recommendation to other brain tumor patients | 13 | 0 |
aNo change, there was no impact on daily life (5) or no change, impact remained the same (2)
bCoping is still good (8), or coping is still not good (0)