Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 1;29(3):e36. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e36

Table 2. Patient-based analysis (n=134).

Variables Pathology Sensitivity (95% CI) Accuracy (95% CI) PPV (95% CI)
Positive Negative
PET/CT (n=73)
Positive 64 8 98.5% 87.7% 88.9%
Negative 1 0 (91.8%–99.7%) (80.1%–95.2%) (79.6%–94.3%)
CECT (n=129)
Positive 115 10 96.6% 89.1% 92.0%
Negative 4 0 (91.7%–98.7%) (83.8%–94.5%) (85.9%–95.6%)
Both PET/CT & CECT (n=68)
PET/CT
Positive 59 8 98.3% 86.8% 88.1%
Negative 1 0 (91.1%–99.7%) (78.7%–94.8%) (78.2%–93.8%)
CECT
Positive 60 8 100% 88.2% 88.2%
Negative 0 0 (94.0%–100.0%) (80.6%–95.9%) (78.5%–93.9%)

CECT, contrast-enhanced computed tomography; CI, confidence interval; PET/CT, positron emission tomography/computed tomography; PPV, positive predictive value.