Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 1;29(3):e36. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e36

Table 3. Lesion-based analysis (n=313).

Variables Pathology Sensitivity (95% CI) Accuracy (95% CI) PPV (95% CI)
Positive Negative
PET/CT (n=169)
Positive 124 21 91.9% 81.1% 85.5%
Negative 11 13 (86.0%–95.4%) (75.2%–87.0%) (78.9%–90.3%)
CECT (n=304)
Positive 212 30 85.8% 78.6% 87.6%
Negative 35 27 (80.9%–89.6%) (74.0%–83.2%) (82.9%–91.2%)
Both PET/CT & CECT (n=160)
PET/CT
Positive 119 21 93.0% 81.3% 85.0%
Negative 9 11 (87.2%–96.3%) (75.2%–87.3%) (78.2%–90.0%)
CECT
Positive 109 17 85.2% 77.5% 86.5%
Negative 19 15 (78.0%–90.3%) (71.0%–84.0%) (79.5%–91.4%)

CECT, contrast-enhanced computed tomography; CI, confidence interval; PET/CT, positron emission tomography/computed tomography; PPV, positive predictive value.