Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 6;15(5):4179–4184. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.5931

Table I.

Correlations between the expression of miR-194 and miR-29 in cancer tissue and the clinicopathological features.

Clinicopathological parameters Cases Relative content of miR-194 P-value Relative content of miR-29 P-value
Age (years) 0.318 0.478
  <60   86 3.11±1.18 4.02±1.23
  ≥60   79 3.44±1.25 3.59±1.05
Sex 0.347 0.236
  Male 102 2.78±1.09 4.25±0.98
  Female   63 3.21±1.10 3.43±0.89
TNM staging 0.029 0.009
  I + II   95 2.62±0.96 4.59±1.43
  III + IV   70 3.56±1.22 3.36±1.37
Differentiation 0.017 0.024
  Low   93 2.61±1.03 3.36±0.97
  Medium/High   72 3.52±1.62 4.34±1.13
Lymph node metastasis 0.009 0.010
  Yes   76 2.56±1.14 3.18±0.87
  No   89 3.45±1.45 4.27±1.28