Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 22;7(4):45. doi: 10.3390/foods7040045

Table 3.

The effects of different ionizing irradiation treatments (gamma- and e-beam irradiation) on microbial load and mycotoxin content in various sample matrices.

Target Organism/Toxin Treatment Sample Matrix Technological Impact References
Natural fungal population 0.75 kGy gamma millet none [44]
Natural microbial load 6 kGy e-beam chestnuts No effect on nutritional value [45,46]
L. monocytogenes 3.3 kGy e-beam (soft electrons) Alfalfa sprouts No quality deterioration [47]
Aspergillus spp., Alternaria spp., Fusarium spp., Curvularia spp., Helminthosporium spp. 1.5–3.5 kGy gamma wheat Reduced quality for doses >2.5 kGy [48]
Fusarium spp. 4 kGy gamma Barley Reduced quality [49]
Fusarium spp. 6 kGy gamma Wheat and maize Reduced quality [49]
Aspergillus spp., Penicillium spp. 10–15 kGy e-beam Dry split beans No quality deterioration (10 kGy) [50]
Penicillium spp., Fusarium spp., Aspergillus spp. 1.7–4.8 kGy e-beam corn Not investigated [41]
Fusarium spp. and DON 6–10 kGy e-beam Barley, malt Not investigated [51]
OTA and aflatoxins 15 kGy gamma Wheat and sesame Not investigated [52,53,54]
OTA 2 kGy gamma Aqueous solution - [55]
DON, ZEN, T-2, FB1 10 kGy gamma Soy beans, corn, wheat Not investigated [56]
FB1 7 kGy gamma Barley, wheat, maize Not investigated [49]
aflatoxins 1.5 kGy e-beam Ground almond flour Not investigated [57]

DON: Desoxynivalenol; OTA: Ochratoxin A; ZEN: Zearalenone; T-2: Fusariotoxin T 2; FB1: Fumonisin B1; -: none.