Table 3.

Mean Concurrency Attitude Factor Scores (MCAFS) Among Pre- and Post-Campaign Respondents, by Gender

Unadjusted
	MCAFS 1	95% CI	Difference Between Pre-and Post-Campaign Scores	95% CI	p 2
Total Cohort (N=1157)
Pre-Campaign	3.40	3.23, 3.57	−0.78	−1.01, −0.54	***
Post-Campaign	2.62	2.46, 2.78
Men (N=414)
Pre-Campaign	3.96	3.65, 4.27	−0.76	−1.18, −0.34	**
Post-Campaign	3.20	2.91, 3.48
Women (N=743)
Pre-Campaign	3.01	2.84, 3.18	−0.85	−1.08, −0.61	***
Post-Campaign	2.16	2.00, 2.32
Model A: Adjusted for demographic and risk characteristics 3
	MCAFS 1	95% CI	Difference Between Pre-and Post-Campaign Scores	95% CI	p 2
Total Cohort (N=1157)
Pre-Campaign	3.37	3.21, 3.53	−0.75	−0.97, −0.54	***
Post-Campaign	2.62	2.47, 2.76
Men (N=414)
Pre-Campaign	3.85	3.55, 4.15	−0.77	−1.17, −0.38	**
Post-Campaign	3.08	2.82, 3.34
Women (N=743)
Pre-Campaign	3.04	2.87, 3.21	−0.80	−1.03, −0.57	***
Post-Campaign	2.24	2.08, 2.40
Model B: Adjusted for variables in Model A + participant and partner concurrency (previous 6 months)
	MCAFS 1	95% CI	Difference Between Pre-and Post-Campaign Scores	95% CI	p 2
Total Cohort (N=1157)
Pre-Campaign	3.37	3.21, 3.52	−0.74	−0.94, −0.53	***
Post-Campaign	2.63	2.48, 2.77
Men (N=414)
Pre-Campaign	3.85	3.56, 4.13	−0.77	−1.15, −0.39	***
Post-Campaign	3.07	2.82, 3.33
Women (N=743)
Pre-Campaign	3.05	2.89, 3.21	−0.78	−0.99, −0.55	***
Post-Campaign	2.27	2.11, 2.44

Note.

¹MCAFS: Mean concurrency attitude factor score was derived from the concurrency attitude scale, which was developed from the vignette-style items (described in methods). Possible scores ranged between 1 and 10. A lower score indicates less acceptance of concurrency; a higher score denotes greater acceptance of concurrency.

²P values

^*<0.05;

^**<0.01

^***<0.0001

³Age, gender, marital status, education, employment, food insecurity, binge drinking in past month, marijuana use in past year.