Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 27.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012 May 7;16(7):924–927. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.11.0816

Assessing capacity for diagnosing tuberculosis in children in sub-Saharan African HIV care settings

M J A Reid *,, S Saito , R Fayorsey , R J Carter , E J Abrams
PMCID: PMC5920677  NIHMSID: NIHMS826052  PMID: 22583761

Summary

Research on the prevalence of pediatric-specific tuberculosis (TB) diagnostics in sub-Saharan Africa is scarce. We assessed the availability of pediatric TB diagnostic tests at 651 pediatric human immunodeficiency virus care and treatment sites across nine African countries: 54% of the sites had access to sputum culture capacity and 51% to chest X-ray services. While 87% of sites had access to smear microscopy, only 6% had the capacity to perform sputum induction and 5% to perform gastric aspirate. These findings confirm that diagnostic resources for the accurate diagnosis of pediatric TB are limited. Capacity-building initiatives to improve sputum collection in children are urgently required.

Keywords: tuberculosis, HIV, pediatric, diagnosis


THE DIAGNOSIS of tuberculosis (TB) in children living with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in sub-Saharan Africa is challenging:1 sputum and culture confirmation rarely exceeds 30–40%.2 In most instances, the diagnosis of TB is based on clinical criteria alone.3 The clinical difficulties of diagnosing TB in HIV-positive children are well described. However, accurate diagnosis is also limited by programmatic limitations: specifically, the limited capability to acquire sputum samples in children unable to expectorate and the lack of trained personnel to perform and interpret TB diagnostic procedures in children.

In the present analysis, we describe the availability of TB diagnostic procedures and tests at sites providing pediatric HIV services in nine sub-Saharan countries. We sought to determine the proportion of sites that had access to chest X-ray (CXR), sputum culture and smear microscopy, and how many reported a capacity to perform sputum induction, naso-pharyngeal aspirate (NPA) and gastric aspirate (GA). We also sought to determine facility characteristics associated with the presence of these diagnostic capabilities.

Methods

In September 2010, we surveyed 651 sites providing HIV services in nine countries (Cote d'Ivoire, Ethiopia, Kenya, Mozambique, Nigeria, Rwanda, South Africa, Swaziland and Tanzania) that received support from the International Center for AIDS Care and Treatment Programs (ICAP) at Columbia University, New York, through funding from the government of the United States. National policy in each of these countries includes routine screening for TB in HIV-infected children.

Survey questions included access to TB diagnostic tests (smear microscopy, CXR and sputum culture onsite or offsite), capacity to perform specific pediatric TB diagnostic procedures (sputum induction, GA and NPA) and program characteristics. All sites provided HIV services to HIV-infected and HIV-exposed children aged 0–15 years. A recent assessment of this annual survey showed 83% test-retest agreement across multiple countries.4 χ2 tests were used to assess the association of program and facility characteristics with the capacity to perform or with access to the following pediatric TB diagnostic procedures or tests: smear microscopy, GA, sputum induction, NPA, sputum culture and CXR. We examined the presence of these procedures or tests in relation to location (urban, semi-urban, rural, defined as per Demographic and Health Surveys criteria5), facility type (primary, secondary, tertiary and private), program maturity (years since initiation of pediatric HIV services), and overall program size (cumulative number of children and adults enrolled in care). Statistical analysis was performed using SAS software version 9.2 (SAS, Cary, NC, USA).

The protocol was reviewed by the Institutional Review Board of the Columbia University, New York, and received non-human subject research determination.

Results

As of September 2010, 651 sites surveyed in this analysis had cumulatively enrolled 82 413 HIV-infected and HIV-exposed children (Table 1). Sputum smear microscopy was available at 87% of the sites, serving 98% of all children enrolled in care (n = 565 sites, range across countries [RAC] 28–100%); 5% (n = 34, RAC 0–21%) had the capacity to perform GA collection, 6% (n = 39, RAC 0–24%) had the capacity to perform sputum induction and 2% (n = 12, RAC 0–7%) had the capacity to perform NPA. Mycobacterial culture (performed onsite or offsite) was available at 54% (n = 352, RAC 2–97%) of the sites. Nearly all sites with advanced capacity to obtain sputum (sputum induction and GA) performed sputum culture; however, respectively only 10% and 8% of the sites with access to sputum culture had sputum induction or GA capacity; 51% (n = 330, RAC 18–89%) had access to CXR, performed either onsite or offsite.

Table 1. HIV care and treatment site characteristics, September 2010 (N = 651).

Number of pediatric HIV care and treatment sites n (%) Children aged 0–14 years enrolled in HIV care and treatment* n (%)
Total 651 82 413
Country
 Cote d'Ivoire 60 (9) 455 (1)
 Ethiopia 62 (10) 8 145 (10)
 Kenya 157 (24) 15 510 (19)
 Mozambique 60 (9) 23 138 (28)
 Nigeria 28 (4) 2 863 (3)
 Rwanda 42 (6) 3 742 (4)
 South Africa 67 (10) 8 666 (11)
 Swaziland 49 (8) 14 883 (18)
 Tanzania 126 (19) 5 011 (6)
Location
 Urban 128 (20) 30 987 (38)
 Semi-urban 204 (31) 28 101 (34)
 Rural 319 (49) 23 327 (28)
Clinic type
 Primary 379 (58) 27 673 (34)
 Secondary/tertiary 196 (30) 50 769 (62)
 Private/other 76 (12) 3 971 (4)
Program size (cumulative number of HIV-infected adults and children enrolled in care)
 <352 320 (50) 4 926 (6)
 ≥352 324 (50) 77 487 (94)
 Data missing 7 0
Program maturity (years since inception of pediatric HIV services), years
 ≥5 50 (8) 22 735 (28)
 ≥3–<5 155 (24) 27 616 (34)
 ≥1–<3 358 (55) 30 855 (37)
 <1 88 (14) 1 207 (1)
*

Cumulative number enrolled, pre-ART and on ART.

HIV = human immunodeficiency virus; ART = antiretroviral therapy.

In bivariate analysis, availability of TB diagnostics (Table 2) and the capacity to procure sputum samples (Table 3) were more likely at urban than rural sites, with the exception of sputum induction. Tertiary and secondary sites were more likely to have the capacity to perform GA (4% vs. 10%, P = 0.0037) and sputum induction (3% vs. 13%, P < 0.001) and have access to CXR (36% vs. 84%, P < 0.001) compared to primary care sites. CXR (33% vs. 69%, P < 0.001) was more prevalent at sites with larger HIV programs.

Table 2. Bivariate analysis: factors associated with availability of diagnostic tests for diagnosing TB in children at pediatric HIV care and treatment sites in nine countries, September 2010 (N = 651)*.

Smear microscopy Sputum culture Chest X-ray



n (%) PR (95%CI) P value n (%) PR (95%CI) P value n (%) PR (95%CI) P value
Total pediatric HIV sites 565 (87) 352 (54) 330 (51)
Total pediatric patients served by surveyed sites 80 596 (98) 61 471 (7) 60 967 (74)
Location
 Urban 107 (92) 1.1 (0.99–1.1) NS 78 (67) 1.2 (1.0–1.4) NS 89 (77) 2.2 (1.8–2.6) <0.0001
 Semi-urban 174 (83) 0.96 (0.89–1.0) NS 87 (42) 0.73 (0.60–0.87) NS 126 (60) 1.7 (1.4–2.1) <0.0001
 Rural 284 (87) 1.0 187 (57) 1.0 115 (35) 1.0
Facility type
 Primary 317 (83) 1.0 206 (54) 1.0 137 (36) 1.0
 Secondary/ tertiary 189 (98) 1.2 (1.1–1.2) <0.0001 126 (66) 1.2 (1.1–1.4) 0.0059 161 (84) 2.3 (2.0–2.7) <0.0001
 Private/other 59 (76) 0.91 (0.80–1.0) NS 20 (26) 0.47 (0.32–0.70) 0.0002 32 (41) 1.1 (0.85–1.5) NS
Program size (cumulative no. of children and/or adults enrolled)
 <352 244 (76) 0.97 (0.96–0.98) <0.0001 121 (38) 0.95 (0.93–0.97) <0.0001 105 (33) 1.0 <0.0001
 ≥352 316 (98) 1.0 230 (71) 1.0 224 (69) 2.1 (1.8–2.5)
Program maturity (years since initiation of pediatric HIV services), years
 ≥5 49 (98) 1.3 (1.1–1.5) 0.0004 39 (78) 1.9 (1.4–2.6) <0.0001 44 (88) 2.8 (2.0–3.8) <0.0001
 ≥3–<5 155 (100) 1.0 (0–0) NS 110 (71) 1.7 (1.3–2.3) <0.0001 113 (73) 2.3 (1.7–3.2) <0.0001
 ≥1–<3 299 (84) 1.1 (1.0–1.3) 0.0452 167 (47) 1.1 (0.87–1.50) NS 145 (41) 1.3 (0.91–1.8) NS
 <1 62 (70) 1.0 36 (41) 1.0 28 (32) 1.0
Country
 Cote d'Ivoire 17 (3) 1 (2) 19 (32)
 Ethiopia 62 (11) 37 (60) 55 (89)
 Kenya 147 (26) 135 (86) 58 (37)
 Mozambique 57 (10) 52 (87) 49 (82)
 Nigeria 28 (5) 10 (36) 24 (86)
 Rwanda 42 (7) 31 (74) 15 (36)
 South Africa 66 (12) 65 (97) 43 (64)
 Swaziland 37 (7) 10 (20) 9 (18)
 Tanzania 109 (19) 11 (9) 58 (46)
*

The table excludes missing values. Categories are not mutually exclusive. Facilities were able to choose multiple responses.

Statistically significant.

TB = tuberculosis; HIV = human immunodeficiency virus; PR = prevalence ratio; CI = confidence interval; NS = non-significant.

Table 3. Bivariate analysis: factors associated with reported capacity to procure sputum samples in children at pediatric HIV care and treatment sites in nine countries, September 2010 (n = 651)*.

Naso-pharyngeal aspirate Gastric aspirates Induced sputum



n (%) PR (95%CI) P value n (%) PR (95%CI) P value n (%) PR (95%CI) P value
Total pediatric HIV sites 12 (2) 34 (5) 39 (6)
Total pediatric patients served by surveyed sites 3 814 (5) 11 236 (14) 7 729 (9)
Location
 Urban 6 (5) 16.9 (2.1–138.6) 0.0086 14 (12) 3.9 (1.8–8.6) 0.0006 7 (6) 1.0 (0.43–2.3) NS
 Semi-urban 5 (2) 7.8 (2.1–66.3) 0.0599 10 (5) 1.6 (0.66–3.7) NS 12 (6) 0.94 (0.47–1.9) NS
 Rural 1 (0.3) 1.0 10 (3) 1.0 20 (6) 1.0
Facility type
 Primary 5 (1) 1.0 14 (4) 1.0 12 (3) 1.0
 Secondary/tertiary 7 (4) 2.8 (0.89–8.6) NS 19 (10) 2.7 (1.4–5.3) 0.0037 24 (13) 4.0 (2.0–7.8) <0.0001
 Private/other 0 1 (1) 0.35 (0.05–2.6) NS 3 (4) 1.2 (0.35–4.2) NS
Program size (cumulative no. of children and/or adults enrolled)
 <352 2 (1) 4.9 (1.1–22.4) 0.038 8 (3) 1.0 14 (4) 1.0
 ≥352 10 (3) 1.0 26 (8) 3.2 (1.5–7.0) 0.0033 25 (8) 1.8 (0.93–3.3) NS
Program maturity (years since initiation of pediatric HIV services), years
 ≥5 8 (16) 9 (18) 5.3 (1.5–18.6) 0.0096 8 (16) 1.8 (0.70–4.4) NS
 ≥3–<5 3 (2) 10 (6) 1.9 (0.53–3.7) NS 10 (6) 0.71 (0.29–1.7) NS
 ≥1–<3 1 (0) 12 (3) 1.0 (0.28–3.4) NS 13 (4) 0.40 (0.17–0.93) 0.0342
 <1 0 3 (3) 1.0 8 (9) 1.0
Country
 Cote d'Ivoire 1 (2) 0 0
 Ethiopia 0 0 15 (24)
 Kenya 0 2 (1) 11 (7)
 Mozambique 3 (5) 4 (7) 2 (3)
 Nigeria 1 (4) 3 (11) 1 (4)
 Rwanda 3 (7) 8 (19) 3 (7)
 South Africa 3 (4) 14 (21) 3 (4)
 Swaziland 0 2 (4) 2 (4)
 Tanzania 1 (1) 1 (1) 2 (2)
*

The table excludes missing values. Categories are not mutually exclusive. Facilities were able to choose multiple responses.

Statistically significant.

TB = tuberculosis; HIV = human immunodeficiency virus; PR = prevalence ratio; CI = confidence interval; NS = non-significant.

Discussion

The findings of our analysis are cause for alarm, given the high toll of disease and death among HIV-infected children in Africa. While the majority of the sites had the capacity to perform smear microscopy and had access to mycobacterial culture, essential for diagnosing TB in both adults and children, a much smaller fraction had capacity to perform any of the sputum collection procedures necessary in children unable to expectorate.

Given the limitations of clinical criteria alone in diagnosing TB in children with HIV,6,7 it is worrying that relatively few sites have the capacity to obtain pediatric sputum samples for microscopy and culture. Lack of resources was particularly acute at primary care sites and at sites located in rural areas. These findings highlight the urgent need to increase access to accurate TB diagnostics in areas of high HIV prevalence and TB endemicity. To be effective, scale-up in access needs to occur commensurate with the policy of decentralizing HIV services from tertiary/secondary to primary care sites that is ongoing in many sub-Saharan countries.

There are several exciting developments in the field of TB diagnostics, including Cepheid's GeneXpert system, Xpert® MTB/RIF (Sunnyvale, CA, USA).8 However, the accuracy of this assay in diagnosing TB in children is predicated on obtaining good quality sputum samples. The utility of Xpert MTB/RIF will be compromised if sputum collection capacity is not improved. Our analysis demonstrates that any expansion in Xpert MTB/RIF use must occur in tandem with concerted efforts to build capacity for improved sputum collection for those children unable to expectorate spontaneously.

This study had several limitations. We were not able to distinguish whether lack of diagnostic capacity was due to lack of human resources or diagnostic hardware. Furthermore, where it was available, we were unable to differentiate the quality, comprehensiveness or availability of diagnostic capacity. Strengths of our study include the large number of sites, which allowed us to conduct an analysis of the availability of pediatric TB diagnostics across several sub-Saharan countries. Given that ICAP provides antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) to approximately 9% of persons on ARVs in eight of the nine countries included,* we believe that our findings are arguably representative of President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) funded programs from a diverse array of settings and contexts.9

Conclusion

Across 651 pediatric HIV sites in Africa, resources for the diagnosis of TB in children were limited. While 87% of the sites had access to smear microscopy, fewer than 10% had the capacity to procure sputum samples in children unable to expectorate spontaneously. Capacity-building initiatives to improve sputum collection in children are urgently needed.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank and acknowledge the field staff from the International Center for AIDS Care and Treatment Programs who completed the site assessments. They also acknowledge the Ministries of Health of Kenya, Tanzania, Ethiopia, Rwanda, Mozambique, South Africa, Nigeria, Lesotho, Democratic Republic of Congo, Zambia, Swaziland and Cote d'Ivoire, whose HIV care and treatment programs they endeavor to support through this work. Finally, the authors thank W El Sadr for overall leadership on program activities. The activities described in this article were funded through the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief through the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Footnotes

*

Swaziland excluded.

References

  • 1.Hesseling AC, Schaaf HS, Gie RP, Starke JR, Beyers N. A critical review of diagnostic approaches used in the diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2002;6:1038–1045. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zar HJ, Hanslo D, Apolles P, Swingler G, Hussey G. Induced sputum versus gastric lavage for microbiological confirmation of pulmonary tuberculosis in infants and young children: a prospective study. Lancet. 2005;365:130–134. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17702-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Harries AD, Parry C, Nyong'onya Mbewe L, et al. The pattern of tuberculosis in Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi: 1986–1995. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1997;1:346–351. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.International Center for AIDS Care and Treatment Programs. Unpublished PFaCTs data quality assurance exercise from nine African countries. New York, NY, USA: ICAP; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.United States Agency for International Development. Calverton, MD, USA: DHS; 2012. [Accessed March 2012]. Demographic and health surveys, 2012. http://www.measuredhs.com/ [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Walters E, Cotton MF, Rabie H, Schaaf HS, Walters LO, Marais BJ. Clinical presentation and outcome of tuberculosis in human immunodeficiency virus infected children on anti-retroviral therapy. BMC Pediatr. 2008;8:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-8-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Marais BJ, Graham SM, Cotton MF, Beyers N. Diagnostic and management challenges for childhood tuberculosis in the era of HIV. J Infect Dis. 2007;196(Suppl 1):S76–S85. doi: 10.1086/518659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nicol MP, Workman L, Isaacs W, et al. Accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF test for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children admitted to hospital in Cape Town, South Africa: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11:819–824. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70167-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.World Health Organization/Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS/United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2010. [Accessed March 2012]. Towards universal access: scaling up priority HIV/AIDS interventions in the health sector. http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/2010progressreport/report/en/index.html. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES