Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.

Published in final edited form as: Ear Hear. 2018 May-Jun;39(3):594–604. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000518

TABLE 3.

Results of the Kruskal-Wallis H-test and post-hoc pairwise comparison analyses of CAEP N1 and P2 latency measures.

Measure	Frequency (Hz)	Masker	Signal Condition	Test Statistic χ² (df)	Pairwise Comparison	Post-hoc (z-score)	p-value (adjusted)
N1 Latency	500	GN	NoSo	7.247 (2)			0.027^*
N1 Latency					YNH – ONH	−2.41	0.047^*
					YNH – OHI	−2.24	0.076
					ONH - OHI	0.18	1.000
			NoSπ	2.42 (2)			0.298
		LNN	NoSo	2.95 (2)			0.229
			NoSπ	1.67 (2)			0.433
	4000	GN	NoSo	9.99 (2)			0.007^*
					YNH – ONH	−2.03	0.126
					YNH – OHI	−3.11	0.006^*
					ONH - OHI	−1.08	0.840
			NoSπ	1.37 (2)			0.503
		LNN	NoSo	7.33 (2)			0.026^*
					YNH – ONH	−2.34	0.058
					YNH – OHI	0.01	0.056
					ONH - OHI	2.35	1.000
			NoSπ	2.76 (2)			0.252
P2 Latency	500	GN	NoSo	2.19 (2)			0.334
P2 Latency			NoSπ	4.103 (2)			0.129
		LNN	NoSo	7.685 (2)			0.021^*
					YNH – ONH	2.74	0.018^*
					YNH – OHI	1.72	0.259
					ONH - OHI	−1.03	0.911
			NoSπ	2.15 (2)			0.341
	4000	GN	NoSo	8.55 (2)			0.014^*
					YNH – ONH	1.54	0.372
					YNH – OHI	−1.39	0.498
					ONH - OHI	−2.92	0.010^*
			NoSπ	7.88 (2)			0.020^*
					YNH – ONH	2.63	0.026^*
					YNH – OHI	2.13	0.098
					ONH - OHI	−0.49	1.000
		LNN	NoSo	5.67 (2)			0.059
			NoSπ	6.56 (2)			0.038^*
					YNH – ONH	2.52	0.036^*
					YNH – OHI	0.84	1.000
					ONH - OHI	−1.68	0.281

^*

p < 0.05