Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 21.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet. 2018 Feb 7;391(10130):1599–1607. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30204-6

Extended data Table 1.

Aetiology of skin ulcers prior to MDA of azithromycin and in subsequent rounds of targeted treatment *

Time (month) Participants
tested for PCR
Treponema
pallidum
subsp.
pertenue
only detected
Both T. p.
pertenue and
H. ducreyi
detected
Haemophilus
ducreyi
only detected
Negative
for T. pallidum
and H. ducreyi
no. no. of participants (%)
Baseline 90* 19 (21·1) 12 (13·3) 42 (46·7) 17 (18·9)
6 mo. 84* 14 (16·7) 27 (32·1) 32 (38·1) 11 (13·1)
12 mo. 114 12 (10·5) 7 (6·1) 53 (46·5) 42 (36·8)
18 mo. 88 12 (13·6) 5 (5·7) 35 (39·8) 36 (40·9)
24 mo. 68 6 (8·8) 7 (10·3) 28 (41·2) 27 (39·7)
30 mo. 120 19 (15·8) 12 (10·0) 63 (52·5) 26 (21·7)
36 mo. 107 24 (22·4) 12 (11·2) 49 (45·8) 22 (20·6)
42mo. 107 37 (34·6) 14 (13·1) 30 (28·0) 26 (24·3)
*

Data of PCR-confirmed yaws cases for baseline and 6 months represent a random sample of 90 and 84 ulcers that were tested by PCR from a total of 690 and 121 participants with skin ulcers detected, respectively. Data from 12 months to 42 months represent all ulcers detected.

P<0.0001 by the chi-square test for the between-group comparison within each type of infection.