Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Health Psychol. 2018 Apr 5;37(5):472–480. doi: 10.1037/hea0000592

Table 4.

Regression results for predicting Time 2 PEFR from total number of Time 1 social roles in full HRS sample (N = 4028)

Social Role Type Variables Evaluated Individually in Separate Models a Variables Evaluated Simultaneously in Single Model a
β b p-value CI95 for b β b p-value CI95 for b
Club 0.034 9.163 < .001 [4.137, 14.189] 0.023 6.210 .030 [0.599, 11.822]
Employee 0.023 6.490 .033 [0.516, 12.464] 0.030 8.304 .010 [1.964, 14.644]
Family 0.004 2.377 .706 [−9.969, 14.723] 0.003 1.994 .766 [−11.116, 15.104]
Friends 0.025 15.06 .006 [4.252, 25.868] 0.022 12.736 .031 [1.148, 24.325]
Parent -0.008 -4.576 .380 [−14.786, 5.634] -0.017 -9.661 .106 [−21.363, 2.041]
Religious Service Attendee 0.005 1.274 .624 [−3.826, 6.374] 0.010 2.689 .357 [−3.037, 8.415]
Spouse 0.027 7.875 .006 [2.258, 13.491] 0.030 8.848 .005 [2.738, 14.958]
Volunteer 0.037 10.166 < .001 [5.084, 15.248] 0.035 9.578 .001 [3.898, 15.259]
Addition of SI variables: ΔR2 = 0.004, p < .001

Note: HRS = Health and Retirement Study; PEFR = peak expiratory flow rate

a

All models adjusted for Time 1 PEFR, age, gender, ethnicity, education, height, and weight