Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 27.
Published in final edited form as: Biometrics. 2017 Oct 26;74(2):616–625. doi: 10.1111/biom.12810

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Results of genome-wide cis-eQTL ACME effect size estimations on Thyroid tissue (n = 105) from GTEx data. Top row: comparisons of ACME effect sizes (transformed with w as introduced in Section 4) with both QN and LL effect sizes. Bottom-left: QN vs ACME regression p-values. Bottom-right: Full-tissue procedure times of the Matrix-EQTL and ACME fitting softwares.