Table 1.
Time | Location | N | Mean | Std. deviation | 95% Confidence… | 95% Confidence… | Minimum | Maximum | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||
Lower boundary | Upper boundary | ||||||||
0 min | Cecum | 7 | 41.3 | 23.2 | 19.9 | 62.7 | 7.2 | 66.2 | .42 |
Ileum | 5 | 55.0 | 32.8 | 14.2 | 95.7 | 10.8 | 96.0 | ||
30 min | Cecum | 7 | 39.6 | 21.8 | 19.4 | 59.8 | 13.1 | 78.1 | <.01 |
Ileum | 4 | 83.4 | 16.1 | 57.7 | 109.0 | 68.8 | 105.0 | ||
60 min | Cecum | 7 | 38.9 | 19.1 | 21.2 | 56.6 | 13.9 | 68.2 | <.01 |
Ileum | 5 | 78.7 | 23.8 | 49.2 | 108.2 | 49.3 | 101.0 | ||
90 min | Cecum | 7 | 47.4 | 22.3 | 26.7 | 68.0 | 16.3 | 74.3 | .02 |
Ileum | 5 | 84.7 | 23.5 | 55.5 | 113.9 | 56.0 | 111.0 | ||
120 min | Cecum | 7 | 51.7 | 27.3 | 26.5 | 77.0 | 17.9 | 92.4 | .14 |
Ileum | 5 | 76.4 | 25.6 | 44.6 | 108.2 | 35.7 | 95.6 |
Comparisons performed by repeated measures ANOVA. There was a significant difference between cecum and ileum at 30-, 60- and 90-minutes. P values <.05 were considered significant.