Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 9;7(2):112–116. doi: 10.7762/cnr.2018.7.2.112

Table 2. Associations of handgrip strength with type 2 DM and hyperglycemia.

Variables Crude Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Type 2 DM
Handgrip strength* 2.04 (0.79–5.25) 2.05 (0.79–5.30) 2.25 (0.83–6.06) 2.13 (0.78–5.78) 2.10 (0.77–5.73)
NHS 2.72 (1.32–5.58)§ 2.71 (1.32–5.57)§ 1.59 (0.74–3.44) 1.88 (0.83–4.01) 1.82 (0.83–4.01)
Altered casual glycemia
Handgrip strength* 1.00 (0.99–1.01) 1.00 (0.99–1.01) 1.00 (0.99–1.01) 1.00 (0.99–1.01) 1.00 (0.99–1.01)
NHS 1.00 (1.00–1.01) 1.00 (1.00–1.01) 1.00 (0.99–1.01) 1.00 (0.99–1.01) 1.00 (0.99–1.01)

Data shown are odds ratio (95% confidence interval). Details of each model are follow as: model 1, adjusted by exercise frequency (times/week); model 2, adjusted by age; model 3, adjusted by age and sex; and model 4, adjusted by age, sex, and exercise frequency.

DM, diabetes mellitus; NHS, normalized handgrip strength.

*Handgrip strength is low (muscle weakness) (normal: ≥ p10 or muscle weakness: < p10); NHS (handgrip strength/body weight, male: < 0.46 or female: < 0.30) is low muscle weakness; Altered casual glycemia was classified when > 200 mg/dL was found; §p < 0.05.