Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 27;18:114. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1691-1

Table 2.

Linear regression analyses of MetS (number of risk determinants) and depression (N = 14.416–14.499 a)

Depressive symptoms (PHQ) Somatic-affective symptoms Cognitive-affective symptoms
B (95% CI) B (95% CI) B (95% CI)
Model 1 0.005 (0.000/ 0.009) p = .036 0.010 (0.006/ 0.013) p < .001 −0.008 (− 0.013/ -0.002) p = .010
Model 2 0.014 (0.010/ 0.019) p < .001 0.017 (0.013/ 0.020) p < .001 0.002 (−0.004/ 0.008) p = .498
Model 3 0.008 (0.003/ 0.012) p = .001 0.012 (0.009/ 0.015) p < .001 −0.006 (− 0.011/ 0.000) p < .053
Model 4 0.013 (0.010/ 0.016) p < .001 −0.016 (− 0.021/ -0.011) p < .001

Model 1: without adjustment; Model 2: adjusted for age, sex and socioeconomic status (SES); Model 3: additionally adjusted for somatic conditions (CHD, atrial fibrillation, cancer, myocardial infarction, stroke, PAOD), any anxiety, and psychotropic medication; Model 4: additionally adjusted for cognitive-affective symptoms (dependent variable: somatic-affective symptoms), respectively for somatic-affective symptoms (dependent variable: cognitive-affective symptoms)

aN ranges between 13.363 and 14.499 because of missing data