Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 27.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Intern Med. 2013 May 13;173(9):797–804. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.189

Figure 5. Comparison of Mental Activity Intervention (MA-I) versus Mental Activity Control (MA-C) Groups in Subjects With Normal Memory and Low Memory.

Figure 5

Figure 5 show the three-way interaction between baseline memory, mental activity group and time and raises the possibility that the mental activity intervention (MA-I) training may have led to greater cognitive improvements than the mental activity control (MA-C) training in subjects with low memory at baseline, although the interaction and the between-group effects were both of borderline statistical significance.