Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 27;13(4):e0196532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196532

Table 3. Diagnostic differences between ELISA tests used for samples collected in Ireland (April 2013) and in Belgium (September 2016) with inclusion of suspect/doubtful in the negative results (a) and in the positive results (b).

    a) Suspect/doubtful included in the negative results
PPA (%) NPA (%) a κ
Ireland IDEXX 37 (25–50) 78 (40–96) 0.05 (0.06)
ID.Vet 88 (77–95) 67 (31–91) 0.46 (0.14)
Belgium Ewes IDEXX 77 (54–91) NA NA
ID.Vet 91 (69–98) NA NA
Lambs IDEXX 64 (46–79) 97 (84–100) 0.61 (0.08)
ID.Vet 97 (84–100) 100 (88–100) 0.97 (0.12)
    b) Suspect/doubtful included in the positive results
PPA (%) NPA (%) a κ
Ireland IDEXX 47 (34–60) 78 (40–96) 0.10 (0.07)
ID.Vet 95 (83–98) 67 (31–91) 0.57 (0.14)
Belgium Ewes IDEXX 95 (75–100) NA NA
ID.Vet 95 (75–100) NA NA
Lambs IDEXX 86 (70–95) 97 (94–100) 0.83 (0.06)
ID.Vet 100 (88–100) 100 (88–100) 1.00 (0.02)

Abbreviations: PPA—positive percentage of agreement, NPA—negative percentage of agreement, κ - Cohen’s Kappa

a For each κ value, the standard error is indicated between the brackets. NA—an error if the calculations could not be achieved due to the properties of the tested population.