Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Health Phys. 2018 Jun;114(6):602–622. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000838

Table 3.

Estimates of 50th percentiles and 90% CIs of LDEF based on analyses of curvature in dose-responses (ERRs or EARs) for mortality from all solid cancers in LSS cohort assuming linear-quadratic modelsa

Reference Dose range
(Gy)
Follow-up
period
Method of
calculation
LDEFb
Little et al. (2008) 0–4c 1950–2000 [1 + (β/α)]d (ERR model)e 1.34 (1.01, 2.53)f
[1 + (β/α)]d (EAR model)e 1.51 (1.07, 3.26)g
Ozasa et al. (2012) 0–2h 1950–2003 [1 + (β/α)]d (ERR model)i 3.2 (1.2, 8.3)j
αLLQk (ERR model)i 2.0 (1.0, 6.8)m
0–4n [1 + (β/α)]d (ERR model)i 1.11 (0.94, 1.48)o
αLLQk (ERR model)i 1.16 (0.77, 1.90)p
a

ERRs and EARs estimated using DS02 dosimetry were sex-averaged. LDEFs were included in our analysis to estimate DDREF for solid cancers induced by low-LET radiation.

b

Estimates are based on assumption that reported MLEs and CIs of risk coefficients or ratios of risk coefficients can be represented by Weibull distributions with modes at MLEs.

c

Range of shielded kerma free-in-air from photons and neutrons. Members of LSS cohort with shielded kerma >4 Gy were omitted. Range of neutron-weighted doses to colon, calculated assuming biological effectiveness of neutrons at Hiroshima and Nagasaki relative to high-energy photons of 10, over which ERRs or EARs were modeled to estimate LDEF was slightly less than range of shielded kerma (Egbert 2005; RERF 2007).

d

α (Gy−1) and β (Gy−2) are coefficients of linear and quadratic terms, respectively, in linear-quadratic fit to dose-response, and β/α (Gy−1) is curvature parameter. LDEF is estimate at dose of 1 Gy.

e

ERRs and EARs were modified by time since exposure and attained age.

f

Estimate based on reported MLEs and 90% CIs of α [0.347 (0.161, 0.566) Gy−1] and β [0.121 (0.004, 0.246) Gy−2] and assumption that α and β are negatively correlated (correlation coefficient of −1). Assumed parameter correlation should result in slight overestimate of uncertainty in LDEF.

g

Estimate based on reported MLEs and 90% CIs of α [5.58 (2.31, 9.40) Gy−1] and β [2.86 (0.66, 5.22) Gy−2] and assumption that α and β are negatively correlated (correlation coefficient of −1). Assumed parameter correlation should result in slight overestimate of uncertainty in LDEF.

h

Range of neutron-weighted doses to colon, calculated assuming biological effectiveness of neutrons at Hiroshima and Nagasaki relative to high-energy photons of 10, over which ERRs were modeled to estimate LDEF.

i

ERRs were modified by age at exposure and attained age.

j

Estimate based on reported MLE and 95% CI of β/α [0.81 (0.08, 8.6) Gy−1]. Reported β/α is estimate of curvature in dose-response preferred by Ozasa et al. (2012).

k

αL is ERR per Gy obtained from linear fit to dose-response, and αLQ (Gy−1) is coefficient of linear term in linear-quadratic fit.

m

Estimate based on reported MLEs of αL (0.44 Gy−1) and αLQ (0.22 Gy−1), estimated 95% CIs of αL [(0.33, 0.56) Gy−1] and αLQ [(0.036, 0.43) Gy−1] (D. Preston, personal communication, November 6, 2016), and assumption that αL and αLQ are uncorrelated.

n

Range of shielded kerma free-in-air from photons and neutrons, with estimates of shielded kerma >4 Gy truncated to 4 Gy. Range of neutron-weighted dose to colon, calculated assuming biological effectiveness of neutrons at Hiroshima and Nagasaki relative to high-energy photons of 10, over which ERRs were modeled to estimate LDEF was slightly less than range of shielded kerma (Egbert 2005; RERF 2007).

o

Estimate based on reported MLEs of α (0.36 Gy−1) and β (0.038 Gy−2), estimated 95% CIs of α [(0.21, 0.53) Gy−1] and β [(−0.043, 0.123) Gy−2] (D. Preston, personal communication, November 6, 2016), and assumption that α and β are negatively correlated (correlation coefficient of −1). Assumed parameter correlation should result in slight overestimate of uncertainty in LDEF.

p

Estimate based on reported MLE and 95% CI of αL [0.42 (0.32, 0.53) Gy−1)], reported MLE of αLQ (0.36 Gy−1), estimated 95% CI of αLQ [(0.21, 0.53) Gy−1] (D. Preston, personal communication, November 6, 2016), and assumption that αL and αLQ are uncorrelated.