Table 3.
Reference | Dose range (Gy) |
Follow-up period |
Method of calculation |
LDEFb |
---|---|---|---|---|
Little et al. (2008) | 0–4c | 1950–2000 | [1 + (β/α)]d (ERR model)e | 1.34 (1.01, 2.53)f |
[1 + (β/α)]d (EAR model)e | 1.51 (1.07, 3.26)g | |||
Ozasa et al. (2012) | 0–2h | 1950–2003 | [1 + (β/α)]d (ERR model)i | 3.2 (1.2, 8.3)j |
αL/αLQk (ERR model)i | 2.0 (1.0, 6.8)m | |||
0–4n | [1 + (β/α)]d (ERR model)i | 1.11 (0.94, 1.48)o | ||
αL/αLQk (ERR model)i | 1.16 (0.77, 1.90)p |
ERRs and EARs estimated using DS02 dosimetry were sex-averaged. LDEFs were included in our analysis to estimate DDREF for solid cancers induced by low-LET radiation.
Estimates are based on assumption that reported MLEs and CIs of risk coefficients or ratios of risk coefficients can be represented by Weibull distributions with modes at MLEs.
Range of shielded kerma free-in-air from photons and neutrons. Members of LSS cohort with shielded kerma >4 Gy were omitted. Range of neutron-weighted doses to colon, calculated assuming biological effectiveness of neutrons at Hiroshima and Nagasaki relative to high-energy photons of 10, over which ERRs or EARs were modeled to estimate LDEF was slightly less than range of shielded kerma (Egbert 2005; RERF 2007).
α (Gy−1) and β (Gy−2) are coefficients of linear and quadratic terms, respectively, in linear-quadratic fit to dose-response, and β/α (Gy−1) is curvature parameter. LDEF is estimate at dose of 1 Gy.
ERRs and EARs were modified by time since exposure and attained age.
Estimate based on reported MLEs and 90% CIs of α [0.347 (0.161, 0.566) Gy−1] and β [0.121 (0.004, 0.246) Gy−2] and assumption that α and β are negatively correlated (correlation coefficient of −1). Assumed parameter correlation should result in slight overestimate of uncertainty in LDEF.
Estimate based on reported MLEs and 90% CIs of α [5.58 (2.31, 9.40) Gy−1] and β [2.86 (0.66, 5.22) Gy−2] and assumption that α and β are negatively correlated (correlation coefficient of −1). Assumed parameter correlation should result in slight overestimate of uncertainty in LDEF.
Range of neutron-weighted doses to colon, calculated assuming biological effectiveness of neutrons at Hiroshima and Nagasaki relative to high-energy photons of 10, over which ERRs were modeled to estimate LDEF.
ERRs were modified by age at exposure and attained age.
Estimate based on reported MLE and 95% CI of β/α [0.81 (0.08, 8.6) Gy−1]. Reported β/α is estimate of curvature in dose-response preferred by Ozasa et al. (2012).
αL is ERR per Gy obtained from linear fit to dose-response, and αLQ (Gy−1) is coefficient of linear term in linear-quadratic fit.
Estimate based on reported MLEs of αL (0.44 Gy−1) and αLQ (0.22 Gy−1), estimated 95% CIs of αL [(0.33, 0.56) Gy−1] and αLQ [(0.036, 0.43) Gy−1] (D. Preston, personal communication, November 6, 2016), and assumption that αL and αLQ are uncorrelated.
Range of shielded kerma free-in-air from photons and neutrons, with estimates of shielded kerma >4 Gy truncated to 4 Gy. Range of neutron-weighted dose to colon, calculated assuming biological effectiveness of neutrons at Hiroshima and Nagasaki relative to high-energy photons of 10, over which ERRs were modeled to estimate LDEF was slightly less than range of shielded kerma (Egbert 2005; RERF 2007).
Estimate based on reported MLEs of α (0.36 Gy−1) and β (0.038 Gy−2), estimated 95% CIs of α [(0.21, 0.53) Gy−1] and β [(−0.043, 0.123) Gy−2] (D. Preston, personal communication, November 6, 2016), and assumption that α and β are negatively correlated (correlation coefficient of −1). Assumed parameter correlation should result in slight overestimate of uncertainty in LDEF.
Estimate based on reported MLE and 95% CI of αL [0.42 (0.32, 0.53) Gy−1)], reported MLE of αLQ (0.36 Gy−1), estimated 95% CI of αLQ [(0.21, 0.53) Gy−1] (D. Preston, personal communication, November 6, 2016), and assumption that αL and αLQ are uncorrelated.