Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 26;62(5):e02497-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02497-17

TABLE 3.

Risk factors for clinical failure of ceftazidime-avibactam therapy among patients with CRE infection

Risk factora Valueb for patients with:
P value Multivariate P value (OR, 95% CI)c
Success (n = 42) Failure (n = 35)
Demographics and underlying conditions
    Male gender 29 (69) 18 (51) 0.16
    Age (yr) 64 (19–91) 59 (26–79) 0.22
    Solid-organ transplant recipient 9 (21) 9 (26) 0.79
    Charlson Comorbidity Index 4 (0–10) 5 (0–10) 0.86
Severity of illness
    ICU at disease onset 17 (40) 27 (77) 0.001 Excluded
    Renal replacement therapy 3 (7) 13 (37) 0.002 0.046 (4.78, 1.0322.2)
    SOFA score 5 (0–18) 8 (0–20) 0.0007 0.13
    SAPS II score 37 (8–62) 43 (17–81) 0.04 0.98
Infection characteristics
    Infection type
        Pneumonia 12 (29) 21 (60) 0.01 0.045 (3.09, 1.039.34)
        Primary bacteremia 15 (36) 5 (14) 0.04
        Urinary tract infection 7 (17) 1 (3) 0.07
        Intra-abdominal infection 3 (7) 4 (11) 0.70
        Skin/soft tissue infection 4 (10) 2 (6) 0.68
        Other 1 (2) 2 (6) 0.59
    CRE pathogen
        K. pneumoniae 34 (81) 25 (71) 0.42
        E. coli 5 (12) 4 (11) 1.00
        E. cloacae 2 (5) 3 (9) 0.65
        Other 2 (5) 2 (6) 1.00
    Presence of blaKPC
        KPC-2 15 (36) 7 (20) 0.20
        KPC-3 19 (45) 17 (49) 0.82
        KPC negative 8 (19) 11 (31) 0.29
Treatment characteristics
    Time to treatment initiation (h) 71 (15–162) 76 (3–168) 0.87
    Ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy 30 (71) 23 (66) 0.63
a

Statistically significant risk factors for clinical failure of ceftazidime-avibactam are shown in boldface. ICU, intensive care unit.

b

Values for categorical variables are numbers (percentages) of patients with the risk factor. Values for continuous variables are medians (ranges).

c

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.