Table 1.
Reference | Authors | Population Involved Controls/Sick | Trained Dogs | Samples Collection and Treatments | Training Method | Results | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[16] | Gordon et al. (2008) | 186 | 57 PCa | 4 |
Storage temperature: −20 °C; Sample preparation: thawed, placed in a screw-top vial; Sample somministration: screw-top vials were put into mason jars |
Training site: trainer’s home Trainer: Owner Duration: 12–14 months Frequency: 2–7 d/w |
Specificity: 1: 36%; 2: 36%; 3: 63%; 4: 81% Sensitivity: 1: <10%; 2: <20%; 3: 20%; 4: 25% |
[17] | Cornu et al. (2010) | training phase: 16; double blind phase: 33 | training phase: 26; double blind phase: 33 | 1 |
Storage temperature: −4 °C; Sample preparation: slowly heating to 37 °C; Sample somministration: samples placed in perforated boxes |
Trainer: Professional Duration: 16 months Frequency: 5 d/w |
Specificity: 91%; Sensitivity: 91% |
[18] | Elliker et al. (2014) | 67 | 50 PCa | 2 |
Storage temperature: −20 °C; Sample preparation: defrosting in a 37 °C water bath; Sample somministration: samples were put in open top propylene test tubes |
Stage 1: dogs had to find and indicate PCa urine samples; Stage 2: dogs had to discriminate PCa samples from controls; No information about duration and frequency of training |
Specificity: 1: 71%; 2: 75%; Sensitivity: 1: 13%; 2: 25% |
[19] | Taverna et al. (2015) | 540 | 362 PCa | 2 |
Storage temperature: −20 °C; Sample preparation: defrosting to 37 °C; Sample somministration: samples were put into circular perforated metal containers placed in thermally sealed plastic containers |
Training Site: central Trainer: professional No information about duration and frequency of training |
Specificity: 1: 98.7%; 2: 97.6%; Sensitivity: 1: 100%; 2: 98.6% |