Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 4;10(4):176. doi: 10.3390/v10040176

Table 2.

Evaluation of the mass spectral quality in terms of signal reproducibility (peaks detected in 100% or 70–99% of mass spectra acquired for each sample) and signal-to-noise ratio of the most intense peak when using five different isolation methods and two matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) matrices.

Phage Isolation Method MALDI Matrix One Term Three Terms
100% Peaks 70–99% Peaks Maximal Signal-to-Noise 100% Peaks 70–99% Peaks
3A CsCl gradient FerA 20 22 504 ± 141 12 18
CsCl gradient HCCA 3 2 107 ± 41 - -
FPLC FerA 4 5 34 ± 11 - -
Ultrafiltration FerA 1 8 16 ± 4 - -
Pellet FerA 23 9 517 ± 219 8 8
Pellet HCCA 15 4 44 ± 4 -
71 CsCl gradient FerA 8 13 397 ± 307 3 15
CsCl gradient HCCA 2 2 5 ± 1 - -
FPLC FerA 5 3 157 ± 72 - -
Ultrafiltration FerA 3 6 17 ± 1 - -
Pellet FerA 11 11 557 ± 108 9 4
Pellet HCCA 14 9 10 ± 1 - -
77 CsCl gradient FerA 10 21 591 ± 96 6 20
CsCl gradient HCCA 11 3 64 ± 11 - -
FPLC FerA 0 0 N/A - -
Ultrafiltration FerA 6 3 19 ± 7 - -
Pellet FerA 12 9 247 ± 36 8 11
Pellet HCCA 9 6 15 ± 7 - -
K1/420 CsCl gradient FerA 41 13 398 ± 122 21 12
CsCl gradient HCCA 17 3 429 ± 30 - -
FPLC FerA 0 0 N/A - -
Ultrafiltration FerA 0 0 N/A - -
Pellet FerA 17 7 125 ± 23 8 7
Pellet HCCA 5 5 29 ± 3 - -
P68 CsCl gradient FerA 13 14 452 ± 122 7 9
CsCl gradient HCCA 4 5 281 ± 18 - -
FPLC FerA 19 11 227 ± 23 - -
Ultrafiltration FerA 5 1 41 ± 15 - -
Pellet FerA 9 9 248 ± 19 5 4
Pellet HCCA 4 4 399 ± 166 - -

Legend: N/A, not applicable; -, not analysed.