Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 27;8(4):194. doi: 10.3390/nano8040194

Table 1.

A comparison of the sensing performance between NH2–Fe3O4/RGO/GCE and other modified electrodes reported in literatures.

Modified Electrodes Linear Range (M) Detection Limit (M) Ref.
NH2–Fe3O4/RGO/GCE 1 × 10−8~1 × 10−7;
1 × 10−7~1 × 10−6;
1 × 10−6~1 × 10−5
4.0 × 10−9 This work
Fe3O4–NH2@GS/GCE 2 × 10−7~3.8 × 10−5 1.26 × 10−7 [24]
Cu2O/RGO/GCE 1 × 10−8~1 × 10−6;
1 × 10−6~8 × 10−5
6.0 × 10−9 [35]
Pd/RGO/GCE 1 × 10−6~1.5 × 10−4 2.3 × 10−7 [47]
Fe3O4@Au/Gr/GCE 5 × 10−7~5 × 10−5 6.5 × 10−7 [48]
Fe3O4/RGO/CPE 2 × 10−8~5.8 × 10−6 6.5 × 10−9 [49]
MWCNT/RGO/GCE 2 × 10−7~4 × 10−4 2.2 × 10−8 [50]
Mn3O4–RGO/GCE 1 × 10−6~1.45 × 10−3 2.5 × 10−7 [51]
MnO2–RGO/GCE 6 × 10−8~1× 10−3;
1 × 10−6 ~8 × 10−5
1.0 × 10−9 [52]
MnO2 NR/RGO/GCE 5 × 10−8 ~ 4 × 10−4 1.0 × 10−8 [53]