Table 3.
Standardised indirect effects and fit indices obtained by SEM, men and women. ELSA-Brasil, 2008–2010 (n = 14,764).
| Indirect Effects | Coefficient Standardised | |
|---|---|---|
| Men | Women | |
| Indirect effects of dissatisfaction at being LI | ||
| Dissatisfied at being LI->Unhealthy eating habits->Poor self-rated health | 0.000 (−0.002;0.003) | −0.003 (−0.006;0.000) |
| Dissatisfied at being LI->Insufficient physical activity->Poor self-rated health | 0.013 (0.000;0.025) * | 0.030 (0.014;0.047) *** |
| Dissatisfied at being LI->Unhealthy eating habits->Insufficient physical activity->Poor self-rated health | 0.002 (0.000;0.003) * | 0.007 (0.004;0.011) *** |
| Total indirect effect | 0.015 (0.002;0.028) * | 0.035 (0.018;0.051) *** |
| Indirect effects of dissatisfaction at being HI | ||
| Dissatisfied at being HI->Unhealthy eating habits->Poor self-rated health | 0.001 (−0.004;0.006) | −0.005 (−0.011;0.000) |
| Dissatisfied at being HI->Insufficient physical activity->Poor self-rated health | 0.026 (0.012;0.039) *** | 0.023 (0.008;0.038) ** |
| Dissatisfied at being HI->Unhealthy eating habits->Insufficient physical activity->Poor self-rated health | 0.004 (0.001;0.006) ** | 0.013 (0.008;0.017) *** |
| Total indirect effect | 0.030 (0.016;0.044) *** | 0.031 (0.015;0.046) *** |
| Model goodness of fit | ||
| CFI | 0.930 | |
| TLI | 0.923 | |
| RMSEA (90%CI) | 0.030 (0.029;0.032) | |
CFI: comparative fit index; TLI: Tucker-Lewis index; RMSEA: root mean square error of approximation; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.