Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Heart Lung. 2018 Apr 4;47(3):205–210. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2018.03.008

Table 2.

Predictors of the Cognitive Appraisal Type Based on the Stress Level (Multiple Linear Regression)

Variable β 95% CI P
Challenge Cognitive Appraisal
 Age 0.06 −0.01 – 0.02 0.68
 Female Gender 0.08 −0.29 – 0.52 0.57
 NYHA class III/IV compared to I/II −0.18 −0.70 – 0.13 0.18
 High stress level compared to low stress level 0.13 −0.21 – 0.62 0.32
Overall Model (Adjusted R2 = −0.02, F=0.665; P= 0.619)
Threat Cognitive Appraisal
 Age 0.39 0.01 – 0.04 0.01
 Female Gender −0.23 −0.81 – 0.01 0.05
 NYHA class III/IV compared to I/II 0.24 0.01 – 0.83 0.46
 High stress level compared to low stress level −0.06 −0.52 – 0.31 0.61
Overall Model (Adjusted R2 = 0.215, F=5.173; P= 0.001)
Harm/loss Cognitive Appraisal
 Age 0.06 −0.01 – 0.02 0.05
 Female Gender 0.01 −0.42 – 0.46 0.91
 NYHA class III/IV compared to I/II 0.20 −0.09 – 0.81 0.12
 High stress level compared to low stress level −0.37 −1.11 – −0.23 <0.001
Overall Model (Adjusted R2 = 0.126, F=3.190; P= 0.020)

Note: CI = confidence interval, β = adjusted regression slope coefficient, NYHA = New York Heart Association