Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Ther. 2018 Mar 28;105:10–16. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2018.03.010

Table 1.

Child and Parent Descriptive Anthropometric and Executive Function Data at Each Assessment Point

Variable Baseline Mid-Tx Post-Tx 6-mo f/u 18 – mo f/u Cohen’s da

Child Parent Child Parent Child Parent Child Parent Child Parent Child Parent
BMI 26.35 31.91 25.39 30.98 24.98 30.56 26.14 31.1 27.44 31.9 −.27 −.15
(3.62) (6.3) (3.53) (6.12) (3.77) (6.28) (4.08) (6.24) (4.38) (6.68) −.11 −.07
.30 .09
.31 .12
BMIz 2 (.34) _ 1.85 _ 1.73 _ 1.79 _ 1.81 _ −.41 _
(.39) (.44) (.46) (.46) −.29
.13
.04
WCST Perseverative Errors 15.66 10.71 _ _ 9.73 6.62 _ _ 8.73 6.65 −.63 .59
(10.92) (8.54) (7.58) (4.89) (6.82) (5.1) −.14 .01
DS Backward 15.46 17.23 _ _ 16.21 17.84 _ _ 16.93 18.02 .25 .17
(2.90) (3.5) (3.14) (3.87) (3.32) (4.16) .22 .04
SST % Trials of Failed Inhibition 48.59% 45.64% _ _ 51.85% 44.13% _ _ 50.18% 40.11% .20 −.10
(16.98) (14.5) (16.05) (14.3) (15.39) (16.18) −.11 −.26

Note: Tx-treatment; mo=month; f/u= follow-up; WCST = Wisconsin Card Sorting Test; DS = Digit Span; SST = Stop Signal Task)

a

Cohen’s d presented for each variable evaluating effects between each timepoint and the subsequent timepoint starting with pre-treatment. Effects are presented with the later timepoint first such that a negative effect indicates a decrease from time 1 to time 2.