Table 2.
p values from the post hoc comparisons between each pair of methods. The asterisks mark statistical significance: ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001.
| CCA (1 corr) | CCA (2 corr) | CCA (3 corr) | CCA (4 corr) | CCA (5 corr) | CCA (6 corr) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCA (1 corr) | — | p < 10−5∗∗∗ | p < 10−9∗∗∗ | p < 10−9∗∗∗ | p < 10−10∗∗∗ | p < 10−10∗∗∗ |
| CCA (2 corr) | — | — | p < 10−4∗∗∗ | p < 10−5∗∗∗ | p < 10−5∗∗∗ | p < 10−5∗∗∗ |
| CCA (3 corr) | — | — | — | p = 0.32 | p = 0.13 | p = 0.017∗ |
| CCA (4 corr) | — | — | — | — | p = 1 | p = 0.017∗ |
| CCA (5 corr) | — | — | — | — | — | p = 0.90 |
| CCA (6 corr) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| ||||||
| CCA (1 corr) + sw | CCA (2 corr) + sw | CCA (3 corr) + sw | CCA (4 corr) + sw | CCA (5 corr) + sw | CCA (6 corr) + sw | |
|
| ||||||
| CCA (1 corr) + sw | — | p < 10−3∗∗∗ | p < 10−5∗∗∗ | p < 10−6∗∗∗ | p < 10−6∗∗∗ | p < 10−6∗∗∗ |
| CCA (2 corr) + sw | — | — | p = 0.21 | p < 10−3∗∗∗ | p < 10−3∗∗∗ | p = 0.0022∗∗ |
| CCA (3 corr) + sw | — | — | — | p = 0.041∗ | p = 0.053 | p = 0.19 |
| CCA (4 corr) + sw | — | — | — | — | p = 1 | p = 1 |
| CCA (5 corr) + sw | — | — | — | — | — | p = 1 |
| CCA (6 corr) + sw | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| ||||||
| CCA (1 corr) | CCA (2 corr) | CCA (3 corr) | CCA (4 corr) | CCA (5 corr) | CCA (6 corr) | |
|
| ||||||
| CCA (1 corr) + sw | p = 0.0014∗∗ | p = 1 | p = 1 | p = 1 | p = 1 | p = 1 |
| CCA (2 corr) + sw | p < 10−8∗∗∗ | p = 0.0015∗∗ | p = 0.22 | p = 0.77 | p = 1 | p = 1 |
| CCA (3 corr) + sw | p < 10−10∗∗∗ | p < 10−4∗∗∗ | p = 0.0025∗∗ | p = 0.0082∗∗ | p = 0.018∗ | p = 0.042∗ |
| CCA (4 corr) + sw | p < 10−10∗∗∗ | p < 10−4∗∗∗ | p < 10−4∗∗∗ | p < 10−3∗∗∗ | p < 10−3∗∗∗ | p < 10−3∗∗∗ |
| CCA (5 corr) + sw | p < 10−10∗∗∗ | p < 10−6∗∗∗ | p < 10−4∗∗∗ | p < 10−4∗∗∗ | p < 10−3∗∗∗ | p < 10−3∗∗∗ |
| CCA (6 corr) + sw | p < 10−10∗∗∗ | p < 10−6∗∗∗ | p < 10−4∗∗∗ | p < 10−4∗∗∗ | p < 10−3∗∗∗ | p < 10−3∗∗∗ |