Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 15;14(10):947–962. doi: 10.2217/fon-2017-0597

Table 4. . Updates in hepatocellular carcinoma selective internal radiation.

Study Trial Phase Number of patients Child–Pugh class Line of therapy Intervention Median OS RR (%) Ref.
Vilgrain et al. SARAH III 459 A/B Failed 2 + rounds of chemoembolization SIRT (Y-90) vs sorafenib 8.0 vs 9.9 (months) (p = 0.179) 19.0 vs 11.6 (p = 0.042) [50]

Pierce et al. SIRveNIB III 360 A/B ≤2 rounds of chemoembolization SIRT (Y-90) vs sorafenib 8.8 vs 10.0 (months) (p = 0.203) 16.5 vs 1.7 (p < 0.001) [51]

Meyer et al. TACE 2 III 313 A 1 TACE + sorafenib vs TACE + placebo 631 vs 598 (days) (p = 0.57) 36 vs 31 (p-value not provided) [53]

OS: Overall survival; RR: Response rate; SIRT: Selective internal radiation therapy; TACE: Transarterial chemoembolization.