Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 30;43(1):103–108. doi: 10.5114/ceji.2018.74880

Table 1.

The characteristics of the eleven studies included in meta-analysis

Study Country Number of controls Number of OLP patients Sex of controls, M : F Sex of OLP patients, M : F Mean age of controls Mean age of OLP patients
Gu, 2004 [2] USA 10 10 3 : 7 1 : 9 62.5 64.1
Goel, 2015 [5] India 10 42 Matched 8 : 7 Matched 46.9
Rhodus, 2005 [13] USA 13 13 0 : 13 0 : 13 58 57
Rhodus, 2006 [14] USA 13 13 Matched 0 : 13 Matched 57.2
Sun, 2005 [15] Taiwan 54 158 4 : 5 43 : 115 NR 51.3
Sun, 2002 [16] Taiwan 77 149 32 : 45 46 : 103 45 53
Liu, 2011 [17] China 43 21 4 : 17 15 : 28 60.4 57.3
Zhang, 2008 [18] China 30 30 1 : 1 8 : 7 40 45
Rhodus, 2005 [19] USA 13 13 3 : 10 4 : 9 58 57
Kaur, 2015 [20] Belgium 50 54 Matched Matched
Yamamoto, 1994 [21] Japan 20 26 1 : 1 3 : 10 34.9 61.2

NR – not reported, M : F – male to female, OLP – oral lichen planus