Table 1.
Study | Country | Number of controls | Number of OLP patients | Sex of controls, M : F | Sex of OLP patients, M : F | Mean age of controls | Mean age of OLP patients |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gu, 2004 [2] | USA | 10 | 10 | 3 : 7 | 1 : 9 | 62.5 | 64.1 |
Goel, 2015 [5] | India | 10 | 42 | Matched | 8 : 7 | Matched | 46.9 |
Rhodus, 2005 [13] | USA | 13 | 13 | 0 : 13 | 0 : 13 | 58 | 57 |
Rhodus, 2006 [14] | USA | 13 | 13 | Matched | 0 : 13 | Matched | 57.2 |
Sun, 2005 [15] | Taiwan | 54 | 158 | 4 : 5 | 43 : 115 | NR | 51.3 |
Sun, 2002 [16] | Taiwan | 77 | 149 | 32 : 45 | 46 : 103 | 45 | 53 |
Liu, 2011 [17] | China | 43 | 21 | 4 : 17 | 15 : 28 | 60.4 | 57.3 |
Zhang, 2008 [18] | China | 30 | 30 | 1 : 1 | 8 : 7 | 40 | 45 |
Rhodus, 2005 [19] | USA | 13 | 13 | 3 : 10 | 4 : 9 | 58 | 57 |
Kaur, 2015 [20] | Belgium | 50 | 54 | – | – | Matched | Matched |
Yamamoto, 1994 [21] | Japan | 20 | 26 | 1 : 1 | 3 : 10 | 34.9 | 61.2 |
NR – not reported, M : F – male to female, OLP – oral lichen planus