Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 30;13(4):e0196450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196450

Table 4. Fit statistics for the study models (n = 1247).

Model Model description χ2 df CFI TLI RMSEA Model comparisons AIC Δ χ2 Δ df
Model A Fully mediated model 1822.184 287 0.909 0.897 0.065 1950.184
Model B Model A plus direct paths from Leadership to second set of mediators 1775.234 284 0.912 0.899 0.065 B vs. A 1909.234 46.950*** 3
Model C Model B plus direct paths from first set of mediators to work ability 1765.202 281 0.912 0.898 0.066 C vs. A
C vs. B
1905.202 56.982***
10.032*
6
3
Model D Model C plus a direct path from Job Demands to Positive Work Attitudes 1631.692 280 0.920 0.907 0.062 D vs. A
D vs. B
D vs. C
1773.692 190.492***
143.542***
133.510***
7
4
1
Model E (Final Model) Model D without insignificant paths 1635.540 283 0.920 0.908 0.062 E vs. A 1771.540 186.644*** 4

*** p < .001;

** p < .01;

* p < .05