Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 7;12(1):1–12. doi: 10.1080/19336934.2017.1394558

Table 3.

Heatmap of the 12 most abundant OTUs detected in bacterial recipient flies, showing average read abundance ± standard deviation for each development temperature, per sample type. OTUs are listed with their highest possible taxonomic classification.

  BS-13 BS-23 BS-31 FBS-suc
Proteobacteria; Wolbachia; 83.6 ± 9 82.8 ± 13.1 82.5 ± 14.7 88.1 ± 5.9
Proteobacteria; Acetobacter; 6 ± 4.2 8.2 ± 10.1 7.8 ± 9.9 3.6 ± 3.7
Firmicutes; Leuconostoc; 7.4 ± 4 5.2 ± 2.2 5.2 ± 1.3 5 ± 2.1
Proteobacteria; Acetobacter; 1.4 ± 0.7 2.8 ± 2 3.6 ± 3.6 2 ± 1.2
Firmicutes; f__Leuconostocaceae_OTU_5; 0.7 ± 0.9 0.2 ± 0.2 0.4 ± 0.4 0.2 ± 0.2
Firmicutes; Lactococcus; 0.2 ± 0.3 0.4 ± 0.2 0.1 ± 0.1 0.2 ± 0.1
Firmicutes; Lysinibacillus; 0.1 ± 0.2 0.1 ± 0.1 0.2 ± 0.3 0.2 ± 0.4
Actinobacteria; Corynebacterium; 0.1 ± 0.1 0.1 ± 0.1 0.1 ± 0.2 0.3 ± 0.3
Firmicutes; f__Lactobacillaceae_OTU_10; 0.3 ± 0.2 0.2 ± 0.2 0 ± 0.1 0 ± 0
Firmicutes; Paenibacillus; 0 ± 0 0.1 ± 0.1 0 ± 0 0.1 ± 0.2
Actinobacteria; Corynebacterium; 0.1 ± 0.1 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0.1 ± 0.2
Firmicutes; Paenibacillus; 0.1 ± 0.2 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0